Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ulibarri v. Gerstenberger, 871 P.2d 698.

120 citing documents.

In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Decision of the Court the same circumstances.”
State v. Coker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Coker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Because the appearance bond here served no purpose, and Coker’s failure to appear at the September 28, 2022 hearing was involuntary due to her extradition to Texas, the forfeiture of the $10,000 bond was “harsh, rather than fair and equitable.”
Olen v. Couch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Olen v. Couch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Neglect is excusable when “it is such as might be the act of a reasonably prudent person in the same circumstances,” but carelessness does not equate with excusable neglect.
Williams v. Aps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Williams v. Aps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“Carelessness does not equate with excusable neglect.”
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Excusable neglect exists when “a reasonably prudent person” would do the same “in the same circumstances.”
Pacheco v. Coffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Abebe v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Abebe v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Neglect is excusable when it “might be the action of a reasonably prudent person in the same circumstances.” (construing excusable neglect under civil rule governing relief from judgment).
Pacheco v. Coffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Excusable neglect exists when “a reasonably prudent person” would do the same “in the same circumstances.”
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.G. and C.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.G. and C.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Jacob G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jacob G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sakthiveil v. Clear Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sakthiveil v. Clear Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Hoeveler v. Az Dermatology Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Hoeveler v. Az Dermatology Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Munoz v. Zepeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Munoz v. Zepeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶9 Rule 85(b)(1) of the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure grants the superior court discretion to relieve a party from an order for “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” “Neglect is excusable when it is such as might be the act of a reasonably prudent person in the same circumstances.”
Schirmer v. Avalon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Schirmer v. Avalon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Elbert H. v. Dcs, B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Elbert H. v. Dcs, B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aguilera v. Sannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aguilera v. Sannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Corp., ¶ 14 (App. 2000) (citation omitted); (“Once the defendant has established a prima facie case entitling him to summary judgment, the plaintiff has the burden of showing available, competent evidence that would justify a trial.” (citation omitted)).
Philip W. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Philip W. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
().“The juvenile court is in the best position to make discretionary findings such as what constitutes good cause for failure to appear.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010).
Amedovski v. Amedovski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amedovski v. Amedovski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“Carelessness does not equate with excusable neglect.”
Fitzhugh v. Princeton Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fitzhugh v. Princeton Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rodney S. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Rodney S. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Conduct is excusable if it “is such as might be the act of a reasonably prudent person in the same circumstances.” Christy A., 217 Ariz. at 304, ¶ 16 ().
Dominguez v. National Shotcrete Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dominguez v. National Shotcrete Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Neglect is excusable when it is such as might be the act of a reasonably prudent person in the same circumstances.” (citation omitted).
Shafer v. McCombs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shafer v. McCombs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wyckoff, 232 Ariz. at 591, ¶ 9
Riordan-Karlsson v. Az Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Riordan-Karlsson v. Az Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Once the defendant has established a prima facie case entitling him to summary judgment, the plaintiff has the burden of showing available, competent evidence that would justify a trial.” (citation omitted).
Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Excusable neglect exists if the neglect or inadvertence “is such as might be the act of a reasonably prudent person in the same circumstances.”