Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ponderosa Plaza v. Siplast, 888 P.2d 1315.

26 citing documents.

Berghoff v. Gerdts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Berghoff v. Gerdts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
§ 12-341.01] when the record contains a reasonable basis for the award.”
Callies v. United Heritage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Callies v. United Heritage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Heatec, Inc. v. R.W. Beckett Corp. 197 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Heatec, Inc. v. R.W. Beckett Corp. 197 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Co., , (noting that a party can only recover expenses that are enumerated as costs under the statute); , (noting that if the legislature had desired to expand A.R.S.
Foster v. Weir Orthodontic Centers of Arizona, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Foster v. Weir Orthodontic Centers of Arizona, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
The legislature has limited witness fees in § 12-303 to include compensation only for mileage for traveling to court from the witness’s “place of residence in the state of Arizona to the place of trial.” (travel expenses of out-of-state witnesses not taxable as costs pursuant to § 12-332).
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Co., Inc., , (holding that claims for breach of implied warranty arise out of contract); , (awarding reasonable attorneys’ fees to the defendant under A.R.S.
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
*17 (1993), as support for this view.
In Re Naarden Trust 990 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
In Re Naarden Trust 990 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-33 , -20 (App.1993) (fee award under section 12-341.01 to roofing material manufacturer sued for breach of express warranty upheld because no special relationship existed between the parties).
Moore v. Kieber 990 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Moore v. Kieber 990 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-33 , -20 (App.1993) (fee award under section 12-341.01 to roofing material manufacturer sued for breach of express warranty upheld because no special relationship existed between the parties).
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Bach 973 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1999
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Bach 973 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1999
See, e.g., Ponderosa Plaza v. Siplast, *403 , (“[I]f the legislature had wanted to [expand the statute], it would have clearly done so.”); Fowler v. Great American Ins.
Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10 961 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10 961 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equip. v. PROP. & CAS. INS. GUAR. 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ponderosa Plaza v. Siplast, 181 *
Clark Equip. v. PROP. & CAS. INS. GUAR. 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ponderosa Plaza v. Siplast, 181 *
Pelletier v. Johnson 937 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Pelletier v. Johnson 937 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Imperial Litho/Graphics v. M.J.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by