Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Smith v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., 876 P.2d 1166.
- Preciado v. Young America Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Preciado v. Young America
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Co., (concluding the trial court erred in awarding attorneys’ fees pursuant to A.R.S.
- Engler v. Gulf Interstate Engineering, Inc. 258 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-
Engler v. Gulf Interstate Engineering, Inc.
258 P.3d 304
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Co., -36 , -71 (App. 1994); Ohio Farmers Ins.
- BRYSTAL McCLOUD v. THOMAS MAX KIMBRO Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
-
BRYSTAL McCLOUD v. THOMAS MAX KIMBRO
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Co., -36, -71 (App. 1994), (actions, including those serving personal desires, deemed in scope of employment if incidental to empl
- State v. Young 224 P.3d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
State v. Young
224 P.3d 944
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., , (finding no ratification when supervisor did not have knowledge of sexual misconduct).
- Catherine E. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
-
Catherine E. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLC
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co., (“According to the doctrine of respondeat superior, ‘an employer is vicariously liable .
- Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc. 173 P.3d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-
Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc.
173 P.3d 453
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
which *297 held that an “employer was not vicariously liable for a supervisor’s harassment and sexual assaults on an employee because the supervisor’s acts were not expressly or impliedly authorized by the employer or in furtherance of its business.” 189 Ariz. at 256 , 941 P.2d a
- McCloud v. State of Arizona Dept. of Public Safety And Kimbro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-
McCloud v. State of Arizona Dept. of Public Safety And Kimbro
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Co., (internal citations omitted).
- Alberta Securities Commission v. Ryckman 30 P.3d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Alberta Securities Commission v. Ryckman
30 P.3d 121
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Express Travel Related Servs.
- Cummins v. Mold-In Graphic Systems 26 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Cummins v. Mold-In Graphic Systems
26 P.3d 518
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Co., , (“Title VII liability is much broader than common law tort liability.”).
- Baker v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, Inc. 5 P.3d 249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
-
Baker v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, Inc.
5 P.3d 249
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
-36 , -71 (1994); Ohio Farmers Ins.
- State, Dept. of Admin. v. Schallock 941 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1997
- State, Dept. of Admin. v. Schallock 941 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1997
- Smithey v. Hansberger 938 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
Smithey v. Hansberger
938 P.2d 498
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Co., , Swichtenberg, 171 Ariz. at 82 , 828 P.2d at 1223 .
- Ortiz v. Clinton 928 P.2d 718 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Ortiz v. Clinton 928 P.2d 718 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Schallock 914 P.2d 1306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Schallock 914 P.2d 1306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- MacK v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Co. 880 P.2d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
MacK v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Co.
880 P.2d 1173
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Co., -141 , -76 (App.1994); Woerth, 167 Ariz. at 417 -18 n. 7, 808 P.2d at 302 -03 n. 7.