Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Amerco v. Shoen, 907 P.2d 536.
- Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6
93 P.3d 1095
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
154 n. 4, , 540 n. 4 (App.1995).
- Data Sales Co. v. Diamond Z Manufacturing 74 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- Data Sales Co. v. Diamond Z Manufacturing 74 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- Pro Finish USA, Ltd. v. Johnson 63 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
-
Pro Finish USA, Ltd. v. Johnson
63 P.3d 288
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
(adopting Principles for use in Arizona).
- Bike Fashion Corp. v. Kramer 46 P.3d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
Bike Fashion Corp. v. Kramer
46 P.3d 431
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
341 ¶ 16, , (“Prejudicial instructions are those which, by statement or omission, support a resolution that is harmful to the complaining party and contrary to law.”).
- Monthofer Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Allen 943 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
Monthofer Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Allen
943 P.2d 782
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
A jury instruction should not give undue prominence to either party’s theory of the case, but rather should tell the jury “in neutral terms of the legal rules to be applied.” Id.; see also AMERCO v. Shoen, M.D.
- Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse
945 P.2d 317
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
P. 13(a)(6) (establishing necessary elements of an argument on appeal); , 154 n. 4, , 540 n. 4 (App. 1995) (cursory assertion without argument or authority insufficient to preserve issue for appeal).
- State v. Dunlap 930 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
State v. Dunlap
930 P.2d 518
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Finally, we disagree with the state that, in the interest of fairness, it should have been permitted to introduce otherwise inadmissible hearsay to rebut the content of Mrs. Bolles’ 1976 “hearsay.” , to support its proposition.