Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Anderson v. Country Life Insurance, 886 P.2d 1381.

41 citing documents.

Dillon v. Pitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Dillon v. Pitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Carter Oil v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Carter Oil v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Markham Contracting Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Co. 379 P.3d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Markham Contracting Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Co. 379 P.3d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Nick Hardy v. Nyberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Nick Hardy v. Nyberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 363 P.3d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 363 P.3d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Allen C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Allen C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Abromovitz v. Red Eyed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Abromovitz v. Red Eyed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co., (citation omitted).
State ex rel. Raber v. Hongliang Wang 286 P.3d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
State ex rel. Raber v. Hongliang Wang 286 P.3d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Blevins v. Government Employees Insurance 258 P.3d 274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Blevins v. Government Employees Insurance 258 P.3d 274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION v. City of Glendale 253 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION v. City of Glendale 253 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Co., , (stating that “where the issues can be decided as a matter of law, we have the authority both to vacate the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of one party and to enter summary judgment for the other party if appropriate”).
CNL Hotels & Resorts, Inc. v. Maricopa County 244 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
CNL Hotels & Resorts, Inc. v. Maricopa County 244 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Bither v. Country Mutual Insurance 245 P.3d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Bither v. Country Mutual Insurance 245 P.3d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., , (“[Wjhere the issues can be decided as a matter of law, we have the authority both to vacate the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of one party and to enter summary judgment for the other party if appropriate.”).
Wilshire Insurance v. S.A. 227 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Wilshire Insurance v. S.A. 227 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., -35 , -91 (App.1994) (“illusory” coverage “contravenes public policy”); Ranger Ins.
Messina v. MIDWAY CHEVROLET CO. 209 P.3d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Messina v. MIDWAY CHEVROLET CO. 209 P.3d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Co., , (arguments not presented until reply brief may not be considered by appellate court); , (generally, an appellant may not raise issues for the first time in a reply brief; if appellant does so, appellate court may di
Espinoza v. Schulenburg 108 P.3d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Espinoza v. Schulenburg 108 P.3d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co. 31 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Marriage of Muchesko v. Muchesko 955 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Marriage of Muchesko v. Muchesko 955 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n 943 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n 943 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
General Motors Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 938 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
General Motors Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 938 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Princess Plaza Partners v. State 928 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Princess Plaza Partners v. State 928 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(Where the issues can be decided as a matter of law, the appellate court has the authority both to vacate the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of one party and to enter summary judgment for the other party if appropriate).
7200 Scottsdale Road General Partners v. Kuhn Farm MacHinery, Inc. 909 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
7200 Scottsdale Road General Partners v. Kuhn Farm MacHinery, Inc. 909 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by