Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Miel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 912 P.2d 1333.
- State Farm v. Frank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State Farm v. Frank
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Co., (“If the [insurance] company breaches its duty [of good faith and fair dealing], its insured .
- Callies v. United Heritage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Callies v. United Heritage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Nardelli v. Metropolitan Group Property & Casualty Insurance 277 P.3d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Nardelli v. Metropolitan Group Property & Casualty Insurance
277 P.3d 789
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Co., , Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Ins.
- Acosta v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Company Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Acosta v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Company Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero 106 P.3d 1020 Ariz. 2005
-
Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero
106 P.3d 1020
Ariz. 2005
Co., P.2d 1333 (App. 1995) (involving an agreement entered into after alleged bad faith failure to settle by insurer).
- Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero 83 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-
Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero
83 P.3d 560
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Co., 109-10 , 1338-39 (App.1995) (accepting that Damron agreement was valid, although remanding case because jury received incomplete instructions regarding bad faith claim).
- Cummins v. Mold-In Graphic Systems 26 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Cummins v. Mold-In Graphic Systems
26 P.3d 518
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Co., , (emphasis added).
- Lifeflite Medical Air Transport, Inc. v. Native American Air Services, Inc. 7 P.3d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Lifeflite Medical Air Transport, Inc. v. Native American Air Services, Inc. 7 P.3d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 984 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
- Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 984 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
- Mora v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance 996 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- Mora v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance 996 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- Meineke v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 991 P.2d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- Meineke v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 991 P.2d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- Goodman v. Samaritan Health System 990 P.2d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-
Goodman v. Samaritan Health System
990 P.2d 1061
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Compare Hazine, 176 Ariz. at 344 , 861 P.2d at 629 (right to recover for injury from product recognized at common law, thus strict product liability claim is a cognizable common law claim even though concept of strict product liability unknown at statehood), , (dismissai of claim by insured against insurer for “negligent claims handling” affirmed over anti-abrogation objection because “no cause of action has ever been recognized for negligence in a ease like this”)
- Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
943 P.2d 729
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Co., -11 , -40 (App.1995), review granted, (March 19,1996) (no cause of action in negligence for insurer’s handling of a claim against its insured).