Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Life Investors Insurance Co. of America v. Horizon Resources Bethany, Ltd., 898 P.2d 478.

32 citing documents.

Samuel Paz v. City of Tucson 539 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Samuel Paz v. City of Tucson 539 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Bethany, Ltd., (jury instruction need not be model instruction so long as it does not mislead jury when read alongside all instructions).
Dillon v. Pitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Dillon v. Pitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Bethany, Ltd., (holding that a challenge to the failure to give a mitigation-of-damages jury instruction based on insufficiency of the evidence required moving for new trial).
Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Bethany, Ltd., ("A jury instruction need not be a model instruction, as long as it does not mislead the jury when the instructions are read together and in light of each other.").
Wells Fargo v. Terrenate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Wells Fargo v. Terrenate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Wing v. U-Haul Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Wing v. U-Haul Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bethany, Ltd., (internal quotation omitted).
Carey v. Soucy 431 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Carey v. Soucy 431 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Bethany, Ltd., see also Newman, 219 Ariz. at 272, ¶45.
Atkins v. Snell & Wilmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Atkins v. Snell & Wilmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Imh v. Aperion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Imh v. Aperion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Horizon Resources Bethany, Ltd., (recognizing that actual post-sale conduct does not alter fair market value as of the date of the sale).
Keg Restaurants Arizona, Inc. v. Jones 375 P.3d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Keg Restaurants Arizona, Inc. v. Jones 375 P.3d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLC 312 P.3d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLC 312 P.3d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Bethany, Ltd., , (post-sale leasing efforts were relevant to test the expert’s assumptions underlying his valuation).
DeVries v. State 211 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
DeVries v. State 211 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Bethany, Ltd., , (citation omitted).
Strawberry Water Co. v. Paulsen 207 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Strawberry Water Co. v. Paulsen 207 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In Re Estate of Newman 196 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In Re Estate of Newman 196 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Co. of America v. Horizon Resources Bethany, Ltd., , (“Arizona Constitution Article II, section 23 preserves a right to a jury trial only in those actions that existed at common law when the Arizona Constitution was adopted in 1910.”).
Hull v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Hull v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Crackel v. Allstate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Crackel v. Allstate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 4 P.3d 1018 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 4 P.3d 1018 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
v. Horizon Resources Bethany, Ltd.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by