DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Brown v. Arizona Department of Real Estate, 890 P.2d 615.

30 citing documents.

  • Simms v. Simms 567 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Simms v. Simms 567 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Est., (citation omitted) (“Whether substantial evidence supports the decision is a question of law[.]”).
  • Schnurr v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Schnurr v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    See Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Est.
  • Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    See Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, (App. 1995) (citing Gershweir, 160 Ariz. at 205); see also Restatement (Second) of Agency § 267 (1958) (justifiable reliance).
  • E.L. v. Hon Carman 500 P.3d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • E.L. v. Hon Carman 500 P.3d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    “Immunity statutes seek an accommodation between the requirements of the [F]ifth Amendment and legitimate government demands to compel testimony.” Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Est., (citing Kastigar v. U.S., 406 U.S. 441, 445–46 (1972)).
  • Cobia v. Abon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Cobia v. Abon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    § 41-1092.07(F)(1) (stating an administrative hearing may be conducted “without adherence to the rules of evidence required in judicial proceedings”); Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, (“An administrative hearing is not a criminal proceeding.
  • Joseph v. v. McKay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Joseph v. v. McKay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See generally Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, (“The delay clearly violated [the agency’s] own rules and is hardly a model of efficient decision-making.
  • Minch v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Minch v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶ 12 (App. 2010); Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate
  • Shudak v. Azcc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Shudak v. Azcc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    (noting agency’s violation of its rules was “hardly a model of efficient decision-making,” but that appellant was required to show that such a violation caused him to lose a significant legal right rising to the level of a due process violation).
  • Hackett v. Hackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Hackett v. Hackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Mothersed v. Greenen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Mothersed v. Greenen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Brown v. Arizona Dep’t of Real Estate
  • Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc. 270 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
  • Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc. 270 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
    Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate
  • Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
  • Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
    e ADR agreement.6 The estate argues “[t]here can be no dispute that Florentine was not Robert’s express agent” because, inter alia, “there was no express contract of agency.” But, as noted above, “[t]he authority of an actual agent can be either express, or implied.” Canyon State Canners, see also Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, (“Agency may be proven by an express contract between the parties or by facts implying a contract.”); Cote, 128 Ariz. at 444, 626 P.2d at 608 (“No express contract
  • Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc. 118 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
  • Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc. 118 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
    Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Gig lio, , 195, , 167 (1976); Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate
  • Lombardo v. Albu 4 P.3d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • Lombardo v. Albu 4 P.3d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
    ¶ 14 Nor does Brown v. Arizona Dep’t of Real Estate, , imply the existence of a duty in this case.
  • Aranki v. RKP Investments, Inc. 979 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
  • Aranki v. RKP Investments, Inc. 979 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
    Code (“A.A.C.”) R4-28-1101(A); Brown v. Arizona Dep’t of Real Estate, -29 , -24 (App.1995).