Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc., 874 P.2d 982.

74 citing documents.

Democratic Party of Pima County v. Beth Ford Pima County Board of Supervisors 269 P.3d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Democratic Party of Pima County v. Beth Ford Pima County Board of Supervisors 269 P.3d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Mgmt., Inc., 178 Ariz. 425, 430
MOTZER Dba RLM DESIGNS v. ESCALANTE Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
MOTZER Dba RLM DESIGNS v. ESCALANTE Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C. 261 P.3d 784 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C. 261 P.3d 784 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Mgmt., Inc., , accord Hale v. Amphitheater Sch.
Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 236 P.3d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 236 P.3d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Maleki v. Desert Palms Professional Properties, L.L.C. 214 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Maleki v. Desert Palms Professional Properties, L.L.C. 214 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Bogard v. CANNON & WENDT ELEC. CO., INC. 212 P.3d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Bogard v. CANNON & WENDT ELEC. CO., INC. 212 P.3d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Mgmt., Inc., , (rejecting argument that starting point for calculating attorneys’ fee amount "should have been the ...
Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Burke v. Az State Retirement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Burke v. Az State Retirement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Mgmt., Inc., (citation omitted), quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433, 103 S. Ct. 1933, 1939, 76 L. Ed. 2d 40, 50 (1982).
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. 43 P.3d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. 43 P.3d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
); discouraging employers from inducing a person to enter into and perform under an employment contract while intending to later exert pressure on the employee to accept less than he or she is entitled to under the contract, Schade, 158 Ariz. at 8, 14 , 760 P.2d at 1057, 1063 ; providing incentive to settle wage disputes without litigation, Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc., , and punishing employers who force their employees “to resort to the courts in an unreasonable or b
McEvoy v. Aerotek, Inc. 34 P.3d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
McEvoy v. Aerotek, Inc. 34 P.3d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Mgmt., Inc., , ( , (citations ommitted)).
Crum v. Maricopa County 950 P.2d 171 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Crum v. Maricopa County 950 P.2d 171 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Mgt.
Farmers Insurance v. Tallsalt 953 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Farmers Insurance v. Tallsalt 953 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Farmers also argues that its superior entitlement to a fee award is supported by the principle that, in Arizona, “a party [is] ‘successful’ if he obtains judgment for an amount in excess of the set off or counterclaim allowed.” Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc., , (quoting Ocean West Contractors, Inc. v. Halec Constr.