Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Styles v. Ceranski, 916 P.2d 1164.

100 citing documents.

Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Butler v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Butler v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Glazer v. State 321 P.3d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Glazer v. State 321 P.3d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 258 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 258 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
¶ 29 Finally, we note that “[i]n reviewing a jury verdict, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to sustaining the verdict.”
Brethauer v. General Motors Corp. 211 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Brethauer v. General Motors Corp. 211 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Warne Investments, Ltd. v. Higgins 195 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Warne Investments, Ltd. v. Higgins 195 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Miller Park, L.L.C. 164 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Miller Park, L.L.C. 164 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Acuna v. Hampton And Kroack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Acuna v. Hampton And Kroack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Nonetheless, “‘it is not only our right, but our duty, to set aside a verdict’ if there is no 20 evidence in the record to justify it.” see also Min-A-Con Equip.
ChartOne, Inc. v. Bernini 83 P.3d 1103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Chartone, Inc. v. Mercaldo, Ltd. Webb, Pc. Durazzo & Eckel Smart Professional Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
ChartOne, Inc. v. Bernini 83 P.3d 1103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Chartone, Inc. v. Mercaldo, Ltd. Webb, Pc. Durazzo & Eckel Smart Professional Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mealey v. Arndt 76 P.3d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Mealey v. Arndt 76 P.3d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Golonka v. General Motors Corp. 65 P.3d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Golonka v. General Motors Corp. 65 P.3d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Ogden v. J.M. Steel Erecting, Inc. 31 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Ogden v. J.M. Steel Erecting, Inc. 31 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
¶ 17 We also base this conclusion on this Court’s
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
See Styles v. Ceranski , Cole v. Gerhart, 5 Ariz.App.
Larsen v. Decker 995 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Larsen v. Decker 995 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd. 3 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd. 3 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
See Styles v. Ceran-ski, M.D., Ltd.
Warrington v. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 3 P.3d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Warrington v. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 3 P.3d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
See McFarlin, 127 Ariz. at 224 , 619 P.2d at 733 ; Styles v. Ceranski
Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 977 P.2d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 977 P.2d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury verdict and will affirm “if any substantial evidence could lead reasonable persons to find the ultimate facts sufficient to support *92 the verdict.”
Harris v. Harris 991 P.2d 262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Harris v. Harris 991 P.2d 262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Kuhn v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 984 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Kuhn v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 984 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
¶44 , to be controlling.
Pasco Industries, Inc. v. Talco Recycling, Inc. 985 P.2d 535 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Pasco Industries, Inc. v. Talco Recycling, Inc. 985 P.2d 535 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 961 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1998
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 961 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1998
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 933 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 933 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996