Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Purcell, 927 P.2d 340.

26 citing documents.

Dunn v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Dunn v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
See, e.g., Phoenix Newspapers, (“Arizona evinces a general ‘open access’ policy toward public records.”).
Vong v. Aune 328 P.3d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vong v. Aune 328 P.3d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Democratic Party of Pima County v. Beth Ford Pima County Board of Supervisors 269 P.3d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Democratic Party of Pima County v. Beth Ford Pima County Board of Supervisors 269 P.3d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Newspapers, that interest is not implicated where a government actor agrees to disclose the records but needs a court order to retrieve them.
Bither v. Country Mutual Insurance 245 P.3d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Bither v. Country Mutual Insurance 245 P.3d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Estate of Winn 237 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Estate of Winn 237 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Phoenix Newspapers, , (citing Shaw v. State, 8 Ariz.App.
Ziemak v. Schnakenberg 111 P.3d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Ziemak v. Schnakenberg 111 P.3d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Perez v. O’Neil, , (noting that “[i]t is not our domain to render any judgment on the merits” of policy arguments regarding wisdom of rule drafted by supreme court); Phoenix Newspapers, , (We do not “ ‘sit as a super-legislature to determine the wisdom, the necessity, or the inconvenience of a legislative enactment.’ ”), quoting Shaw v. State, 8 Ariz.App.
Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of Tucson 59 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of Tucson 59 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Simat Corp. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 29 P.3d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Simat Corp. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 29 P.3d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
People's Choice TV Corp. v. City of Tucson 20 P.3d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
People's Choice TV Corp. v. City of Tucson 20 P.3d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Arizona Constitution, Article 2, Section 13 has "the same effect as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.” Phoenix Newspapers
State v. Bonnewell 2 P.3d 682 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Bonnewell 2 P.3d 682 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT 3 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT 3 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
If it does, then we determine, second, “whether the classification encompasses all members of the relevant class;” and third, “whether the class is elastic, allowing members to move into and out of the class.” Id.; -81 , -17 (App.1996).
Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 v. KPNX Broadcasting Co. 955 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1998
Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 v. KPNX Broadcasting Co. 955 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1998
1592, 1599 , 48 L.Ed.2d 11 (1976) (citation omitted) (internal quotations omitted); see also Phoenix Newspapers, , (it is well-settled that Arizona evinces a general “open access” policy toward public records).
Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 of Maricopa County v. KPNX Broadcasting Co. 937 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 of Maricopa County v. KPNX Broadcasting Co. 937 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
But see Phoenix Newspapers, , (approving reasonable user fees to underwrite the expenses for compilations of voter registration lists).