Cited by

Piccola By & (emphasis added) ().

lationship, Plaintiffs argued the policy was relevant to show the Trust had obtained “rental” insurance for the property, which in 5 ¶ 9 (2021) (“In Arizona, duty is based on either special relationships recognized by the common law or relationships created by public policy.”) (citations omitted); Piccola By & (“A landlord owes a duty of reasonable care which requires inspection of premises if there is reason to suspect defects existing at the time the tenant takes possession.

See McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 22 (App. 2013) (citing Markowitz, 146 Ariz. at 355)

McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 22, (citing Markowitz, 146 Ariz. at 355, 706 P.2d at 367); (holding that a landlord has a duty to exercise reasonable care for the safety of tenants and others).

McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 22, (citing Markowitz, 146 Ariz. at 355, 706 P.2d at 367); (holding that a landlord has a duty to exercise reasonable care for the safety of tenants and others).3 claims against all parties had been resolved, it appears the superior court intended to reference Rule 54(c), Ariz. R. Civ.

(citing William L. Prosser, Handbook on the Law of Torts, § 30 at 143 (4th ed. 1971)).

(citing William L. Prosser, Handbook of the Law of Torts § 30, at 143 (4th ed.1971))

the court of appeals apparently recognized the principle that a landlord owed a duty of care to its tenant’s social guest, although it found no breach of duty.