DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Conant v. Whitney, 947 P.2d 864.

73 citing documents.

  • Stromberg v. Heirigs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Zubia v. Shapiro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Zubia v. Shapiro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Zambezi v. Proforma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Zambezi v. Proforma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Revive v. Shea-Connelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Revive v. Shea-Connelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    -94 (App. 1997) (holding that arguments raised for the first time in a motion for new trial are waived absent extraordinary circumstances (citations omitted)); ¶ 20 (App. 2014) (holding that a party could not raise a new issue in its motion for a new trial).
  • Sandoval v. Oxford Financial Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Sandoval v. Oxford Financial Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (appellate court generally will not consider issues on appeal not argued before the trial court); –94 (App. 1997) (arguments raised for the first time in a motion for new trial are waived).
  • Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ¶ 58 (2003) (holding failure to object to evidence on Rule 403 grounds waived the objection); (holding that issue raised for the first time in a new trial motion was waived on appeal); see also Muehlebach v. Mercer Mortuary & Chapel, Inc., (holding that the mere mention of a defendants' liability insurance is not per se prejudicial).
  • Rozenman v. Blanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Rozenman v. Blanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    S. Ariz. Freight Lines, (finding appellant "waived the issue by first raising it in the motion for a new trial"); Helena Chem.
  • Cope v. Rawls Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Cope v. Rawls Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Megan E. v. Dcs, H.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Megan E. v. Dcs, H.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    (waiver of argument not raised in superior court).
  • Yf Group v. Farmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Yf Group v. Farmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Amsden v. Bwcdd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Amsden v. Bwcdd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Ogden v. Disys Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Ogden v. Disys Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Alvarado v. Atiemo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Alvarado v. Atiemo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Grayson v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Grayson v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Baldere v. Stark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Baldere v. Stark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    (issues raised for the first time in a motion for a new trial are generally waived on appeal); ¶ 20 (App. 2014) (ex-wife could not use motion for new trial as a vehicle for a revaluation of ex-husband’s firm, when remedy was not at issue in the underly
  • Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Boyilla v. Boyilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Boyilla v. Boyilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Zuluaga ex rel. Zuluaga v. Bashas', Inc. 394 P.3d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
  • Zuluaga ex rel. Zuluaga v. Bashas', Inc. 394 P.3d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
    In any event, we generally will not consider an argument raised for the first time in a motion for a new trial, , or on appeal, , because the trial court and opposing counsel were not afforded an opportunity to address them below.
  • State v. Bankers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Bankers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    See, ¶ 65, (holding that an issue raised for the first time in a motion for judgment as a matter of law following the verdict is waived); (holding that a plaintiff waived his claim of manifest injustice by raising it for the first time in a motion for new trial); (declining to consider the merits of defendants’ objection to an attorneys’ fees
  • Cenite v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Cenite v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    See Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young
  • Ader v. Estate of Felger 375 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
  • Ader v. Estate of Felger 375 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
  • Abn v. Garvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Abn v. Garvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    See, e.g., Nickerson v. Green Valley Recreation, Inc., ¶ 9, see also Evans Withycombe, Inc. v. W. Innovations, Inc., -41 ¶¶ 15-16, -51 (App. 2006) (holding argument relating to claim was waived where first raised in motion to reconsider).
  • Ghosoph v. Kottmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Ghosoph v. Kottmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    In our discretion, issue raised for the first time after trial is deemed to have been waived.”) (), Husband is not precluded from seeking review of the grounds for relief under Rule 85(C)(1)(c).
  • Ekvall v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Ekvall v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (issue waived when first raised in motion for reconsideration); -94, -68 (App. 1997) (issue waived when first raised in motion for new trial).
  • Harris v. godaddy.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Harris v. godaddy.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (concluding that appellant waived issue by first raising it in a motion for new trial).
  • Pachtman v. Pachtman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014