Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bustos v. W.M. Grace Development, 966 P.2d 1000.

26 citing documents.

Silk v. Blodgett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Silk v. Blodgett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Grace Dev., (explaining statutory interpretations should not lead to absurd results).
Ziegfield v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ziegfield v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Grace Dev., (“If statutory language is clear and unambiguous, it is normally conclusive unless clear legislative intent to the contrary exists or impossible or absurd consequences would result.”).
siete/mesquite v. ador/mar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
siete/mesquite v. ador/mar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State of Arizona v. Joseph Michael Goddard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Joseph Michael Goddard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Hosea v. City of Phoenix Fire Pension Board 229 P.3d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Hosea v. City of Phoenix Fire Pension Board 229 P.3d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Premiere RV & Mini Storage LLC v. Maricopa County 215 P.3d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Premiere RV & Mini Storage LLC v. Maricopa County 215 P.3d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Wilputte S. 100 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
In Re Wilputte S. 100 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
In Re Maricopa County Superior Court No. Mh2003-000240 78 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
In Re Maricopa County Superior Court No. Mh2003-000240 78 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
HCZ Construction Inc. v. First Franklin Financial Corp. 18 P.3d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
HCZ Construction Inc. v. First Franklin Financial Corp. 18 P.3d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Grace Dev., , (citation omitted).
Walter v. Wilkinson 10 P.3d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Walter v. Wilkinson 10 P.3d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Grace Dev., , (quoting Mail Boxes Etc., U.S.A v. Indus.
State v. Gaffney 8 P.3d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Gaffney 8 P.3d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Grace Development, , and, if the language is clear and unambiguous, we must apply it without resorting to other methods of statutory interpretation.
Norwest Bank (Minnesota), N.A. v. Symington 3 P.3d 1101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Norwest Bank (Minnesota), N.A. v. Symington 3 P.3d 1101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000