Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Siler v. Arizona Department of Real Estate, 972 P.2d 1010.

44 citing documents.

Simms v. Simms 567 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Simms v. Simms 567 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See, e.g., Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Est., ¶ 41 (App. 1998) (“[T]he record must be viewed with deference to the factual findings with inquiry into whether substantial evidence supports those findings.”); In re Non-Member of State Bar of Ariz., Van Dox, ¶ 19 (2007) (“Because substantial evidence supports the Hearing Officer’s finding, we
Allen v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Allen v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Siler v. Arizona Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 41 (App. 1998).
1st Choice v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
1st Choice v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Est., ¶ 15 (App. 1998).
Pascarella v. Mesa Police Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pascarella v. Mesa Police Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bd., ¶ 13 (App. 2007) (citing Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 14 (App. 1998)); see also Brodsky v. City of Phx.
Mac Properties v. Dd Dunlap Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Mac Properties v. Dd Dunlap Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
of Ariz., ¶ 9 (App. 2013) ( ¶ 45 (App. 1998)).
Drunasky v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Drunasky v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 41 (App. 1998) (“On questions of credibility, the [ALJ] is the proper judge.”); see also Paramo v. Indus.
Cabral v. Ddd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Cabral v. Ddd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶11 This Court reviews “the superior court’s ruling to determine whether the record contains evidence to support the judgment, and in doing so, we reach the underlying issue of whether the administrative action was illegal, arbitrary, capricious or involved an abuse of discretion.” Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 14, (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see Ritland v. 1 Absent material revision after the relevant date, we cite a statute’s current version.
Lewis v. Arizona State Personnel Board 379 P.3d 227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lewis v. Arizona State Personnel Board 379 P.3d 227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“The court does not conduct a trial de novo, act as the trier of fact, nor substitute its view of the evidence for that of the agency.” Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 13
Dodge v. Lake Havasu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Dodge v. Lake Havasu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 14
Yamaha v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Yamaha v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 41
McCormick v. Aroc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
McCormick v. Aroc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 56, (citing authority).
Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona 311 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona 311 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
The holder of an easement has only a right “‘to use the land of another for a specific purpose.’” Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate
Pima County Human Rights Committee v. Arizona Department of Health Services 303 P.3d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Pima County Human Rights Committee v. Arizona Department of Health Services 303 P.3d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Bd., Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate
Western States Petroleum, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 304 P.3d 539 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Western States Petroleum, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 304 P.3d 539 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 41
Scalia v. Green 271 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Scalia v. Green 271 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate
State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc. 258 P.3d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc. 258 P.3d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Alaface, 181 Ariz. at 591 , 892 P.2d at 1380 (CFA); Tolleson, 160 Ariz. at 398 , 773 P.2d at 503 (CFA); see Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 26 , (citing Goodyear's intent standard when construing A.R.S.
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 217 P.3d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 217 P.3d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 45 , (quotation omitted).
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Redlon 156 P.3d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Redlon 156 P.3d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See Siler v. Arizona Dep’t of Real Estate
Carlson v. Arizona State Personnel Board 153 P.3d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Carlson v. Arizona State Personnel Board 153 P.3d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 14
Clark v. New Magma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Clark v. New Magma Irrigation & Drainage District 92 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Clark v. New Magma Irrigation & Drainage District 92 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
The holder of an affirmative easement has only a right ‘“to use the land of another for a specific purpose.’ ” Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate
Clark v. New Magma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
The holder of an affirmative easement has only a right “‘to use the land of another for a specific purpose.’” Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate
Arizona Department of Corrections v. State of Arizona Personnel Board 48 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Arizona Department of Corrections v. State of Arizona Personnel Board 48 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Siler v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate, ¶ 13