Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Goodman v. Samaritan Health System, 990 P.2d 1061.
-
Pierce v. Molet
87 P.3d 89
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
§ 12-341.01(C))( , 508 n. 7, ¶ 25, , 1067 n. 7 (App.1999)).
- Moulton v. Napolitano 73 P.3d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
-
Moulton v. Napolitano
73 P.3d 637
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Given our traditional and proper reluctance to reach constitutional issues unless absolutely necessary and our appropriate preference to resolve cases on other grounds, , 505 ¶ 11, “[i]f ...
- Better Homes Construction, Inc. v. Goldwater 53 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
Better Homes Construction, Inc. v. Goldwater
53 P.3d 1139
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Exam’rs, , , *299 622 (App.1987), , 508 n. 7, ¶ 25, , 1067 n. 7 (App.1999).
- Porter v. Triad of Arizona (L.P.) 52 P.3d 799 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- Porter v. Triad of Arizona (L.P.) 52 P.3d 799 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of America 36 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of America
36 P.3d 1200
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-06, ¶ 13 , -65 (App.1999)(arguments not made at the trial level cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal).
- City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc. 32 P.3d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.
32 P.3d 31
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
No. 11, , ¶ 11 , (“It is sound judicial policy to avoid deciding a case on constitutional grounds if there are nonconstitutional grounds dispositive of the case.”).
- Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corp. Commission 20 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corp. Commission
20 P.3d 1169
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
of Dental Exam’rs, ¶ 31 , ¶ 11 , (“It is sound judicial policy to avoid deciding a case on constitutional grounds if there are nonconstitutional grounds dispositive of the case.”).