Cited by

See id.; ¶ 2, 348 ¶ 14 (App. 1998) (spousal maintenance of approximately 25% of husband’s monthly income was proper).

Sec., -52 ¶ 19 (App. 2007); -48 ¶ 136 (App. 1998).

In conducting our review, we “defer to the [superior] court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” ¶ 13 (App. 1998); ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (“Even though conflicting evidence may exist, we affirm the [superior] court’s ruling if substantial evidence supports it.”).

¶16 This court defers to the superior court’s “determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

We do not reassess the credibility of witnesses on appeal, ¶ 13 (App. 1998), and in evaluating a potential source of gross income, the family court “need not restrict its view of the evidence to a few isolated months .

In addition, this court defers “to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s findings and determine whether there was evidence that reasonably supports the court’s findings.” ¶ 5 (App. 1998).

-48, ¶ 13 (App. 1998); Ariz. R. Fam.

¶ 13 (App. 1998) (noting a reviewing court "will defer to the trial court's determination of .

-48, ¶ 13 (App. 1998); Ariz. R. Fam.

¶ 13 (App. 1998) (“We will defer to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.”).