Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 972 P.2d 676.
- Krakana v. Haass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Ridley v. Ridley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Barron v. Barron 443 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Barron v. Barron 443 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 18-19 (App. 1998) ().
- In re Cotter 425 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
-
In re Cotter
425 P.3d 258
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
See § 25-319(B) ; Gutierrez v. Gutierrez , , ¶ 15
- Morrow v. Morrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Morrow v. Morrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Vahidi v. Hosseini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Vahidi v. Hosseini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Baldere v. Stark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Baldere v. Stark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Brumley v. Brumley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Brumley v. Brumley
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 13 (App. 1998); Ariz. R. Fam.
- Lacy v. Lacy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Lacy v. Lacy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Hutki v. Hutki 417 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Hutki v. Hutki
417 P.3d 804
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See, e.g. , Gutierrez v. Gutierrez , , 346, ¶ 5, , 679 (App. 1998).
- Lovejoy v. Lovejoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Lovejoy v. Lovejoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Kern v. Kern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Kern v. Kern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Jimenez v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Herrera v. Rivero
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 16 (App. 2009); ¶ 13 (App. 1998).
-
Jimenez v. Jimenez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In so doing, the family court “is specifically authorized to consider excessive or abnormal expenditures and the concealment or fraudulent disposition of community property when apportioning community property.” ¶ 6 (App. 1998) (citations omitted); see also A.R.S.
- Ervin v. Mills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Ervin v. Mills
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 13 (App. 1998); ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (“Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence or redetermining the preponderance of the evidence.” (citation omitted)).
- Wellman v. Waits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Wellman v. Waits
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 34 (App. 1998) (“[W]e hold that the trial court may consider a party’s settlement position in determining reasonableness under A.R.S.
- Massey v. 1st Hc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Massey v. 1st Hc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Snook v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Snook v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- McDonald v. McDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- McDonald v. McDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Lamb v. Nielsen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Lamb v. Nielsen
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 13 (App. 1998); Ariz. R. Fam.
- Cleary v. Cordero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Cleary v. Cordero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Schickner v. Schickner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Schickner v. Schickner
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 13 (App. 1998); see also O’Hair v. O’Hair, 5 SCHICKNER v. SCHICKNER Decision of the Court (stating that the reviewing court will not re-weigh evidence on appeal).
- Jackman v. McCann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Jackman v. McCann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Pack v. Pack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Pack v. Pack
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Estate of Reinen v. N. Ariz. Orthopedics, Ltd., ¶ 12 (2000) (noting the court is not bound to accept even the uncontradicted evidence of an interested party); ¶ 13 (App. 1998) (“We will defer to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.”); Ariz. R. Fam.