Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 972 P.2d 676.

599 citing documents.

Otto v. Otto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Driss v. Driss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Driss v. Driss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Schecter v. Cassidy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Schecter v. Cassidy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Law P. 82(A) (2016); ¶ 14 (App. 1998).
Prouty v. Hughes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Prouty v. Hughes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wilson v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wilson v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Boyle, 231 Ariz. at 65-66, ¶¶ 8, 13 ( ¶ 15 (App. 1998), ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).
Carey v. Soucy 431 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Butler v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Butler v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Carey v. Soucy 431 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Amadore v. Lifgren 431 P.3d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Amadore v. Lifgren 431 P.3d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
at 424, ¶ 19 (“If the amount calculated under the Guidelines appears adequate under the circumstances, the superior court does not need to consider a deviation allowed by the Guidelines.”); ¶ 13 (App. 1998) (deferring to the superior court’s determinations regarding conflicting evidence and witness credibility).
Krakana v. Haass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ridley v. Ridley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Krakana v. Haass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ridley v. Ridley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Barron v. Barron 443 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Barron v. Barron 443 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 18-19 (App. 1998) ().
In re Cotter 425 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
In re Cotter 425 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
See § 25-319(B) ; Gutierrez v. Gutierrez , , ¶ 15
Morrow v. Morrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Morrow v. Morrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vahidi v. Hosseini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vahidi v. Hosseini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Baldere v. Stark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Baldere v. Stark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brumley v. Brumley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brumley v. Brumley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 13 (App. 1998); Ariz. R. Fam.
Lacy v. Lacy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Lacy v. Lacy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hutki v. Hutki 417 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hutki v. Hutki 417 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See, e.g. , Gutierrez v. Gutierrez , , 346, ¶ 5, , 679 (App. 1998).
Lovejoy v. Lovejoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Lovejoy v. Lovejoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kern v. Kern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kern v. Kern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jimenez v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 16 (App. 2009); ¶ 13 (App. 1998).
Jimenez v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In so doing, the family court “is specifically authorized to consider excessive or abnormal expenditures and the concealment or fraudulent disposition of community property when apportioning community property.” ¶ 6 (App. 1998) (citations omitted); see also A.R.S.
Ervin v. Mills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ervin v. Mills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 13 (App. 1998); ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (“Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence or redetermining the preponderance of the evidence.” (citation omitted)).
Wellman v. Waits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wellman v. Waits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 34 (App. 1998) (“[W]e hold that the trial court may consider a party’s settlement position in determining reasonableness under A.R.S.
Massey v. 1st Hc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018