Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Johnson v. Elson, 967 P.2d 1022.
-
Kenneth T. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
128 P.3d 773
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
We review the statute and rules, and if “there is an apparent conflict between a rule and a statute, the rule and statute are harmonized if possible.” , ¶ 8 n. 4, , 1024 n. 4 (App.1998) (citations omitted).
- Maher v. Urman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
-
Maher v. Urman
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Copeland v. Ariz. Veterans Mem’l Coliseum
- Marriage of Kohler v. Kohler 118 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
- Marriage of Kohler v. Kohler 118 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
- In Detention of Stephen H. 77 P.3d 465 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- In Detention of Stephen H. 77 P.3d 465 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- Norwest Bank (Minnesota), N.A. v. Symington 3 P.3d 1101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Norwest Bank (Minnesota), N.A. v. Symington 3 P.3d 1101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000