Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Garcia v. General Motors Corp., 990 P.2d 1069.

64 citing documents.

Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. 77 P.3d 439 Ariz. 2003
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. 77 P.3d 439 Ariz. 2003
¶19, -4- 1075 (App. 1999).
Hullett v. Cousin 63 P.3d 1029 Ariz. 2003
Hullett v. Cousin 63 P.3d 1029 Ariz. 2003
Garcia v. General Motors Corp., 195 Ariz. 510, 514 n.2, ¶ 8, n.2 (App. 1999).
Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd. 62 P.3d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd. 62 P.3d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Marriage of Donlann v. MacGurn 55 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Marriage of Donlann v. MacGurn 55 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Motors Corp., ¶ 19 , (“Choice-of-law issues are questions of law, which we review de novo.”).
Smith v. Cigna HealthPlan 52 P.3d 205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Smith v. Cigna HealthPlan 52 P.3d 205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
have had a full and fair opportunity and motive to litigate the issue[].” ¶9
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. 43 P.3d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. 43 P.3d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Rodriguez 7 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Rodriguez 7 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
783, 790-91 , 127 L.Ed.2d 47, 58 (1994); see Rivera v. Pugh, 194 F.3d 1064, 1067 (9th Cir.1999); , (availability of collateral es-toppel reviewed de novo).