Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning Commission, 993 P.2d 1078.

26 citing documents.

LYONS v. PHOENIX Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
LYONS v. PHOENIX Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
& Zoning Comm’n, ¶¶ 21-24 (App. 1999) (finding 750 feet from relevant property close enough to show “special damages that will be more substantial than those suffered by the community at large,” but 1,875 feet, given “general allegations of harm” such as “increased traffic and noise,” too far to support standing).
Date Street Capital, LLC v. Clearcover Insurance Company ... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Date Street Capital, LLC v. Clearcover Insurance Company ... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
& Zoning Comm’n, ¶¶ 11, 44 (App. 1999) (treating superior court’s grant of motion to dismiss as one for summary judgment and reviewing record under summary judgment standards where parties stipulated to consideration of evidence extrinsic to complaint, ultimately affirming dismissal).
David Welch v. Cochise Board of Supervisors Ariz. 2021
David Welch v. Cochise Board of Supervisors Ariz. 2021
& Zoning Comm’n, ¶ 15 (App. 1999) (homeowners’ taxpayer status insufficient to challenge rezoning of nearby parcel); Tucson Cmty.
Pawn 1st, LLC v. City of Phoenix 294 P.3d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Pawn 1st, LLC v. City of Phoenix 294 P.3d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 21 Nor are we persuaded by Jachimek’s , requires a different conclusion.
Scenic Arizona v. City of Phoenix Board of Adjustment 268 P.3d 370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Scenic Arizona v. City of Phoenix Board of Adjustment 268 P.3d 370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See, e.g., Blanchard v. Show Low Planning and Zoning Comm’n, ¶¶ 21, 24 , (finding that proximity made it sufficiently likely that traffic, litter, drainage, and noise from the proposed project would significantly affect plaintiffs property); Buckelew v. Town of Parker, *425 452 , 374 (App.1996) (finding
NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma County 209 P.3d 179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma County 209 P.3d 179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning Comm’n, ¶11
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
See Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning Comm’n
Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
1; Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning Comm’n
Center Bay Gardens, L.L.C. v. City of Tempe City Council 153 P.3d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Center Bay Gardens, L.L.C. v. City of Tempe City Council 153 P.3d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning Comm’n, ¶ 11
Mutschler v. City of Phoenix 129 P.3d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Mutschler v. City of Phoenix 129 P.3d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
3 *162 ¶ 7 Treating the City’s motion as one for summary judgment because both parties presented materials beyond the pleadings, see Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning Comm’n, ¶ 11 , Ariz. R. Civ.
Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning Comm'n, ¶ 20 , ( , ).
Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of Marana 81 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of Marana 81 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
“Nonetheless, in addressing questions of standing, we are confronted with ‘questions of prudential or judicial restraint,’ and will impose that restraint to insure that ‘the case is not moot and that the issues will be fully developed by true adversaries.’ ” Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning Comm’n, , quoting Armory Park, 148 Ariz. at 6 , 712 P.2d at 919 (citations omitted).
Smith v. Cigna HealthPlan 52 P.3d 205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Smith v. Cigna HealthPlan 52 P.3d 205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
P. 12(b); Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning Comm’n