DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wayne Cook Enterprises, Inc. v. Fain Properties Ltd. Partnership, 993 P.2d 1110.

42 citing documents.

  • Sanchez v. Jaime Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Sanchez v. Jaime Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Ltd. P’ship, ¶ 12 (App. 1999) (reversing dismissal sanction in part because the superior court made no findings as to whether it “considered and rejected lesser sanctions as a penalty”).
  • Marin v. Rex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Marin v. Rex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Ltd. Partnership, ¶ 12 (App. 1999) (citing cases).
  • Takamiya v. Loiselle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Takamiya v. Loiselle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    4 TAKAMIYA v. LOISELLE, et al. Decision of the Court ¶ 12 (App. 1999)).
  • Garlan v. Garlan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Garlan v. Garlan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Ltd. P’Ship, ¶ 12 (App. 1999)).
  • Berg v. Weiss & Moy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Berg v. Weiss & Moy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Ltd. P’ship, ¶ 12 (App. 1999) (internal citation omitted); see also Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc., (recognizing that no “bright line” rule exists for when dismissal is warranted in cases of spoliation of evidence, and “sanctions therefor should be decided on a case-by-case basis, consid
  • Pacheco v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Pacheco v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Ltd. P’ship, ¶ 12 (App. 1999), and citing Montgomery Ward & ).
  • Boyilla v. Boyilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Boyilla v. Boyilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Ltd. P’ship, ¶ 12, (internal citation omitted)).
  • Russell v. Vairo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Russell v. Vairo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Ltd. P'ship, ¶ 5 (App. 1999), a "willful disregard of discovery obligations" may be a "valid basis" for entry of judgment in favor of the moving party, ¶ 27 (App. 2010).
  • Hastings v. Dumas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Hastings v. Dumas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Ltd. P’ship, ¶ 12, (internal citations omitted).
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Dismissal with Prejudice ¶26 Wife argues finally that the family court erred in dismissing her petition without entering express findings as Wayne Cook Enterprises, P.2d 1110 (App. 1999), requires.
  • Baron v. Dillard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Baron v. Dillard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Ltd. P’ship, ¶ 5 (App. 1999).
  • Saint-George v. Mayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Saint-George v. Mayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • hertz/coy v. Coy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • hertz/coy v. Coy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Little v. State 240 P.3d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
  • Little v. State 240 P.3d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
    Ltd. P’ship, ¶¶ 11-12 , -13 (App.1999) (error to dismiss lawsuit based on discovery violation absent determination whether client or attorney at fault); Montgomery Ward & -23 , -15 (App.1993) (trial court must determine whether party personally at fa
  • Roberts v. City of Phoenix 235 P.3d 265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
  • Roberts v. City of Phoenix 235 P.3d 265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
  • HAMMOUDEH, Dba CALIFORNIA AUTO MARKET v. JADA Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
  • HAMMOUDEH, Dba CALIFORNIA AUTO MARKET v. JADA Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
  • Seidman v. Seidman 215 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • Seidman v. Seidman 215 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    Ltd. P’ ship, ¶ 12 , (citation omitted); see Montgomery Ward & Co., 176 Ariz. at 622 , 863 P.2d at 914 (the record must reflect the court considered less severe sanctions before resorting to the most extreme); Nesmith v. Superior Court (Chives Rest., Inc.)
  • Tilley v. Delci 204 P.3d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • Tilley v. Delci 204 P.3d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    Ltd. P’ship, ¶ 12 , (holding that lesser sanctions should have been considered and rejected before dismissal was used as a sanction).
  • Rivers v. Solley 177 P.3d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • Rivers v. Solley 177 P.3d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • Ziemak v. Schnakenberg 111 P.3d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
  • Ziemak v. Schnakenberg 111 P.3d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
    Ltd. P’ship, , (abuse of discretion to dismiss as sanction for late disclosure); -30 , -52 (App.1996) (abuse of discretion to preclude testimony of expert witness for disclosure violation).
  • Zimmerman v. Shakman 62 P.3d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
  • Zimmerman v. Shakman 62 P.3d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
    Wayne Cook Enter., Inc. v. Fain Properties Ltd. P’ship, ¶ 5