Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Motel 6 Operating Ltd. Partnership v. City of Flagstaff, 991 P.2d 272.

28 citing documents.

Li v. Zhao Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Li v. Zhao Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’ ¶ 7 (App. 1999) (citation omitted).
Benavidez v. Az Board Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Benavidez v. Az Board Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’ ¶ 7 (App. 1999).
Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of Benson 295 P.3d 943 Ariz. 2013
Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of Benson 295 P.3d 943 Ariz. 2013
We disapprove of Motel 6 ¶ 17, insofar as that decision suggests that fees are awardable under § 12-2030 merely because a party prevails in challenging a city’s denial of a zoning permit.
Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of Benson 278 P.3d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of Benson 278 P.3d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
At oral argument before this court, Stagecoach Trails argued for the first time the superior court's award of attorney fees pertaining to its statutory appeal was supported by Motel 6 ¶¶ 15-17 , (upholding attorney-fee award pursuant to § 12-2030 where plaintiffs challenged city signage code provision that conflicted with state law).
Hess v. Purcell 274 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Hess v. Purcell 274 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
& ¶ 45 , (citing Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’ ¶ 15 , ).
Jones v. Paniagua 212 P.3d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Jones v. Paniagua 212 P.3d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 45 , Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’ ¶ 17
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
See Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’ , (purpose of § 9-462.02(A) “ ‘is to prevent the injustice of forcing retroactive compliance and the doubtful constitutionality of compelling immediate discontinuance of a nonconforming use’ ”)
State v. Campoy 149 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State v. Campoy 149 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
See Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’
John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa County 96 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa County 96 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’ ¶ 15
Rawles v. kavanaugh/jones/brock/stapley Ariz. 2004
Rawles v. kavanaugh/jones/brock/stapley Ariz. 2004
Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’-71, ¶ 7, - 4 - 273-74 (App. 1999).
Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of Marana 81 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of Marana 81 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
See Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’ , cf. City of Tucson v. Whiteco Metrocom, Inc., , (“The City’s power to enact zoning ordinances derives exclusively from the state.”).
Burke v. Az State Retirement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Burke v. Az State Retirement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
See Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’ P.2d 272 (App. 1999); Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Dep’t of Corr., P.2d 801 (App. 1997).
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc. 32 P.3d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc. 32 P.3d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
In Motel 6 , we held that updating a nonconforming sign to reflect current company logos and shopping center tenants is a reasonable alteration under A.R.S.
Camelback Plaza Development, L.C. v. Hard Rock Café International (Phoenix), Inc. 25 P.3d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Camelback Plaza Development, L.C. v. Hard Rock Café International (Phoenix), Inc. 25 P.3d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Motel 6 Operating Ltd. P’ ¶ 15