Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Enterprise Leasing Co. of Phoenix v. Ehmke, 3 P.3d 1064.

39 citing documents.

Arborcraft v. Arizona Urban Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Arborcraft v. Arizona Urban Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ahern v. equipmentshare.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ahern v. equipmentshare.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Lattin v. Shamrock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Lattin v. Shamrock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 11 (App. 1999)) (For mixed questions, we accept the superior court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review conclusions of law de novo.).
Betts v. Carr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Betts v. Carr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Diazteca v. Palenque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Diazteca v. Palenque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Smartcomm v. Palmieri Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Smartcomm v. Palmieri Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
v. Ehmke, -50, ¶¶ 15, 22 (App. 1999)).
Wulf v. Barrow 418 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wulf v. Barrow 418 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Ehmke, ¶ 11 (App. 1999).
Orca Communications v. Ann Noder Et vir/pitch Public 337 P.3d 545 Ariz. 2014
Orca Communications v. Ann Noder Et vir/pitch Public 337 P.3d 545 Ariz. 2014
Reynolds v. Reynolds 327 P.3d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Reynolds v. Reynolds 327 P.3d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. Noder 314 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. Noder 314 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Calisi v. Unified Financial Services, LLC 302 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Calisi v. Unified Financial Services, LLC 302 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
In RE MARRIAGE OF REEDER v. Johnson 227 P.3d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In RE MARRIAGE OF REEDER v. Johnson 227 P.3d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Leasing Co. of Phoenix v. Ehmke, *495 ¶ 11
Miller v. Hehlen 104 P.3d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Miller v. Hehlen 104 P.3d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Prairie Island Indian Community v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety 658 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Pro Finish USA, Ltd. v. Johnson 63 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Pro Finish USA, Ltd. v. Johnson 63 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 11 , ("[W]e are not constrained by the legal conclusions from facts found or inferred in the judgment of the trial court nor by findings of the trial court in questions of law or mixed questions of law and fact.").
Bed Mart, Inc. v. Kelley 45 P.3d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Bed Mart, Inc. v. Kelley 45 P.3d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
149-50 ¶¶ 18-21, -70 (App.1999)(recognizing that company’s internal economic records, like profit-and-loss figures and sales revenue, may constitute protectable trade secrets that competitor could use to advantage in pricing and sales decisions)
Retter v. Retter 42 P.3d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Retter v. Retter 42 P.3d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
In re 1996 Nissan Sentra 32 P.3d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
In re 1996 Nissan Sentra 32 P.3d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
(questions of law are reviewed de novo).
Diefenbach v. Holmberg 26 P.3d 1186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Diefenbach v. Holmberg 26 P.3d 1186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001