Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc., 32 P.3d 31.

74 citing documents.

Backus v. State 204 P.3d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Backus v. State 204 P.3d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
See City of Tempe v. Outdoor Sys., Inc., ¶ 7 , (indicating that the appellate court does not reach the constitutional issue if the matter can be decided on non-constitutional grounds).
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
See City of Tempe v. Outdoor Sys., Inc., (appellate court does not reach constitutional issue when matter can be decided on nonconstitutional grounds).
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of Phoenix 142 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of Phoenix 142 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
¶ 5 , City of Tempe v. Outdoor Sys., Inc., ¶ 7
Jeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona 121 P.3d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Jeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona 121 P.3d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc., ¶ 7
Miller v. Hehlen 104 P.3d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Miller v. Hehlen 104 P.3d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Co., , see also City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.
Komalestewa v. Industrial Commission 99 P.3d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Komalestewa v. Industrial Commission 99 P.3d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
See City of Tempe v. Outdoor Sys., Inc., ¶ 7 , (explaining judicial policy is to avoid addressing constitutional issues unless absolutely necessary to resolve a case).
MacKey, Schuessler, Bayly v. Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson 96 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
MacKey, Schuessler, Bayly v. Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson 96 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Sys., Inc.
Thomas and King, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 92 P.3d 429 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Thomas and King, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 92 P.3d 429 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Sys., Inc., ¶ 9 , (“When an ordinance regulates an area that is also regulated by state statute, the ordinance may parallel the statute or even reach beyond the parameters of the statute so long as the ordinance does not conflict with the statute.”).
Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of Marana 81 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of Marana 81 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
See City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc., , (we may affirm even if trial court reached right result for wrong reason); Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., , (“In order to avoid piecemeal litigation, ...
Arizona Water Co. v. Arizona Department of Water Resources 73 P.3d 1267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Arizona Water Co. v. Arizona Department of Water Resources 73 P.3d 1267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc., ¶ 31
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Sys., Inc., , 113 ¶ 31
LaFaro v. Cahill 56 P.3d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
LaFaro v. Cahill 56 P.3d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Sys., Inc., ¶ 7