Cited by

Co., ¶ 13 (App. 2001) (noting that a contract’s “as is” clause transfers the risk of loss and duty to inspect a property for “obvious or reasonably discernible defects” to the buyer).

Co., ¶ 42 (App. 2001) (quotation omitted).

Co., ¶ 20 (App. 2001) (quotations omitted); see also Rule 51(b)(3)(C), (c).

¶ 27 In S , we held that an “as-is” clause may bar a claim relating to a latent defect only to the extent that the buyer reasonably may discover the defect.

Co., -16, ¶¶ 7-10 , -29 (App.2001); -85 , -19 (App.1986); Frazier v. Sw.

Co., ¶ 9 , ("as is" provision in contract "generally operates only as a waiver of breach of warranty claims, not tort claims").

¶ 20 , (purpose of rule requiring specific objection to instruction, including sufficiency of evidence to support instruction, is to advise court of the basis of party’s position so court may not be led into involuntary error).

¶ 20 , (purpose of rule requiring specific objection to instruction, including sufficiency of evidence to support instruction, is to advise court of the basis of party’s position so court may not be led into involuntary error).

Co., Hall, 119 Ariz. at 74, 579 P.2d at 578.

Co., ¶ 12 , (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 611 (Abridged 6th ed.1991)).