Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bonds, 33 P.3d 537.

42 citing documents.

State v. Coker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Coker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Azteca Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Azteca Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Garcia Bail 3 ¶ 19 (App. 2001).
State v. Fender Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Fender Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“The primary purpose of an 8 STATE v. FENDER Decision of the Court appearance bond is to assure a defendant’s appearance at the trial or other hearings.” ¶ 19 (App. 2001).
Lindgren v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lindgren v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Didn't Do It Bail Bonds Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Didn't Do It Bail Bonds Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We review the record “in the light most favorable to support the judgment of the trial court.” ¶ 9 (App. 2002) ( ¶ 5 (App. 2001)).
State v. All Out Now Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. All Out Now Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Haro-Galvez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Haro-Galvez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 9 (App. 2010) ( ¶ 19 (App. 2001)).
State v. Arizona Bailman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Arizona Bailman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Mayfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Mayfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
2 ¶ 19, we review a forfeiture ruling for an abuse discretion, but consider de novo the court’s interpretation of any statutes or rules governing bail bonds.
State of Arizona v. International Fidelity Insurance Co. and Regulator Bail Bonds 355 P.3d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. International Fidelity Insurance Co. and Regulator Bail Bonds 355 P.3d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State v. Seneca Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Seneca Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Liberty Bail Bonds 314 P.3d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Liberty Bail Bonds 314 P.3d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State of Arizona v. Sun Surety Insurance Company 301 P.3d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Sun Surety Insurance Company 301 P.3d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
In Re BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000 238 P.3d 1275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
In Re BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000 238 P.3d 1275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Bail Bonds USA 224 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Bail Bonds USA 224 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
DISCUSSION ¶ 9 “The primary purpose of an appearance bond is to assure a defendant’s appearance at the trial or other hearings.” ¶ 19
State v. Copperstate Bail Bonds 213 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Copperstate Bail Bonds 213 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Bond Forfeiture in Pima County Cause Cr-20031154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
In Re Bond Forfeiture in Pima County Cause Cr-20031154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
JOHN C. v. Sargeant 90 P.3d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
JOHN C. v. Sargeant 90 P.3d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
For example, ¶ 10 , this court reviewed an order forfeiting a defendant’s bond for failure to appear.
State v. Old West Bonding Co. 56 P.3d 42 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Old West Bonding Co. 56 P.3d 42 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶ 9 On appeal, we examine the evidence “in the light most favorable to support the judgment of the trial court.” ¶ 5
State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by