Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Young v. Industrial Commission, 63 P.3d 298.
- Gonzales v. ica/freeport Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Euro v. lopez/special Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Euro v. lopez/special
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003).
-
Gonzales v. ica/freeport
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm'n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003).
- Trey v. airways/hampshire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Trey v. airways/hampshire
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003) (citation omitted).
- hilton/indemnity v. Burch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
hilton/indemnity v. Burch
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003); Lovitch v. Indus.
- Gilmore v. ica/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Percy v. daniele/special Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Gilmore v. ica/phoenix
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, ¶ 14, (appellate court deferentially reviews ALJ’s findings but reviews legal conclusions de novo) (citation omitted); Lovitch v. Indus.
-
Percy v. daniele/special Fund
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, ¶ 14, (appellate court defers to ALJ’s factual findings but reviews questions of law de novo) (citation omitted); Lovitch v. Indus.
- Cuevas v. pacesetter/wesco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Cuevas v. pacesetter/wesco
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
4 CUEVAS v. PACESETTER/WESCO Decision of the Court Comm’n, ¶ 14
- Storey v. mesa/york Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Storey v. mesa/york Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Garrison v. nike/ace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Garrison v. nike/ace
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm'n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003).
- Wildeman v. sofrita/hartford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Wildeman v. sofrita/hartford
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003).
- Drake v. Az Cardinals Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Drake v. Az Cardinals
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003).
- Martinko v. Am fence/old Rep Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Daniel v. constar/depositors Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Martinko v. Am fence/old Rep
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003).
-
Daniel v. constar/depositors
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003); Lovitch v. Indus.
- karsten/sentry v. Sigala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
karsten/sentry v. Sigala
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003) (citing PFS v. Indus.
- Wells v. aps/pinnacle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Wells v. aps/pinnacle
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003) (citation omitted).
- Anger v. O'Reilly Auto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Anger v. O'Reilly Auto
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003).
- Duarte v. amazon/am Zurich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Duarte v. amazon/am Zurich
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14, and view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the award, Lovitch v. Indus.
- Tatman v. pavestone/liberty Fire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Tatman v. pavestone/liberty Fire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Landon v. Industrial Commission 375 P.3d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Cullins v. Sequel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Cullins v. Sequel
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14, (in reviewing findings and awards of the ICA, appellate court defers to ALJ’s factual findings, but reviews questions of law de novo); Lovitch v. Indus.
-
Landon v. Industrial Commission
375 P.3d 86
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003).
- Bennett v. Federal Express Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Bennett v. Federal Express Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- pds/zurich v. Silberschlag Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
pds/zurich v. Silberschlag
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14 1 We cite the current version of applicable statutes when no revisions material to this decision have since occurred.
- Sanders v. Bowie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Sanders v. Bowie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Hemming v. mccarthy/arch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Hemming v. mccarthy/arch
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2003).
- r&l/twin City v. Lemaster Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Canyon v. Acosta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016