Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, 399 P.2d 694.

37 citing documents.

Carbajal v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 190 P.3d 737 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Henry v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 754 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1988
Henry v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 754 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1988
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company
Sherman v. Industrial Commission 761 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Sherman v. Industrial Commission 761 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
See Mead v. American Smelting & Ref Co.
Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Commission 735 P.2d 820 Ariz. 1987
Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Commission 735 P.2d 820 Ariz. 1987
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
-82 , -91 (App.1978); Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
Keeler v. Industrial Commission 592 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Keeler v. Industrial Commission 592 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
See Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company
Nelson v. Industrial Commission 585 P.2d 887 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Nelson v. Industrial Commission 585 P.2d 887 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company
State Compensation Fund v. Joe 543 P.2d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Joe 543 P.2d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Yazzie 541 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Yazzie 541 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Employers Mut. L. Ins. Co. of Wis. v. Indus. Com'n 539 P.2d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Employers Mut. L. Ins. Co. of Wis. v. Indus. Com'n 539 P.2d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
322 , , ” We concur in this determination.
Riley v. Industrial Commission 536 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Riley v. Industrial Commission 536 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
Freig v. Industrial Commission 487 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Freig v. Industrial Commission 487 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
The time that “the right thereto accrued” has been defined as meaning “ ‘ * * * when the claimant knows or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known that he had sustained a compensable injury.’ ” , quoting Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
Bird v. Industrial Commission 483 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Bird v. Industrial Commission 483 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
D, A.R.S.1956, provides: “D. No application for compensation shall be valid or claim thereunder enforceable unless filed within one year after the day upon which the injury occurred or the right thereto accrued.” In the case of Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, , this Court discussed the meaning of this statute.
Nunez v. Arizona Milling Company 439 P.2d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Nunez v. Arizona Milling Company 439 P.2d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
12 , Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, , we believe the holding of the Industrial Commission that no “accident” occurred forecloses the possibility of an “accident” having occurred under the Employers’ Liability Act.
Shepard v. Industrial Commission 431 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Shepard v. Industrial Commission 431 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
This phrase has been interpreted by our case law to mean that the time for filing a case starts to run, ‘ * * * when the injury becomes manifest or when claimant knows or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known that he had sustained a compensable injury.’
Williams v. Industrial Commission 415 P.2d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Williams v. Industrial Commission 415 P.2d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
This phrase has been interpreted by our case law to mean that the time for filing a claim starts to run, “* * * when the injury becomes manifest or when claimant knows or in exercise of reasonable diligence should have known that he had sustained a compensable injury.” Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
Roberts v. Industrial Commission 404 P.2d 715 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Roberts v. Industrial Commission 404 P.2d 715 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Reilly v. Industrial Commission, 1 Ariz.App.