Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Henderson-Jones v. Industrial Commission, 310 P.3d 976.
-
Roman Moreno v. Me Global Inc.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Comm’n, ¶ 9 (App. 2013) (“We recognize that the ALJ is the sole judge of witness credibility.”); Pacific Fruit Exp., 153 Ariz. at 214 (“We do not weigh the evidence .
- Mendez v. phoenix/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Mendez v. phoenix/state
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Comm’n, ¶ 9 (App. 2013).
- J-King v. Conley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
J-King v. Conley
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Comm’n, –92 ¶ 9 (App. 2013) (“[T]he ALJ is at liberty to choose whichever [indicia] he or she finds most credible, and this court will not disturb the ALJ’s conclusion unless it is wholly unreasonable.”).
- Coburn v. Larry H miller/wcf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Coburn v. Larry H miller/wcf
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Comm’n, –92, ¶ 9 (App. 2013).
- Estes v. contracted/commerce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Estes v. contracted/commerce
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Comm'n, ¶ 9 (App. 1 Absent material revision after the relevant date, we cite the current version of a statute or rule.
- Smith v. sanchez/special Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Smith v. sanchez/special Fund
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Comm’n, ¶ 9 (App. 2013).
- Baca v. All quality/copperpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Baca v. All quality/copperpoint
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Comm'n, -92, ¶ 9 (App. 2013) ("When multiple inferences may be drawn, the ALJ is at liberty to choose whichever he or she finds most credible, and this court will not disturb the ALJ's conclusion unless it is wholly unreasonable."); S.L.C.
- Valiente v. residence/travelers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Valiente v. residence/travelers
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm'n, ¶ 9 (App. 2013).
- Martin v. Camp Verde usd/arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Martin v. Camp Verde usd/arizona
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm'n, ¶ 9 (App. 2013).
- Gonzales v. ica/freeport Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Gonzales v. ica/freeport
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm'n, ¶ 9 (App. 2013).
- Percy v. daniele/special Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Percy v. daniele/special Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Garrison v. nike/ace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Garrison v. nike/ace
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm'n, ¶ 9 (App. 2013).
- Vega Rangel v. luevano/special Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Vega Rangel v. luevano/special Fund
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm'n, -92, ¶ 9 (App. 2013).