Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Garcia v. Industrial Commission, 548 P.2d 26.
- Douglas v. montecito/safety Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Douglas v. montecito/safety Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Gilbert Aguirre Jr v. ica/city of Goodyear Ariz. 2019
- Aguirre v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz. 445 P.3d 1040 Ariz. 2019
-
Gilbert Aguirre Jr v. ica/city of Goodyear
Ariz. 2019
Comm’n, (setting aside award where ALJ made no findings on the material issues in the case, including necessary findings resolving the conflicting testimony of the medical witnesses).
-
Aguirre v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.
445 P.3d 1040
Ariz. 2019
Comm'n , , 315, (setting aside award where ALJ made no findings on the material issues in the case, including necessary findings resolving the conflicting testimony of the medical witnesses).
- Baca v. All quality/copperpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Baca v. All quality/copperpoint
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Comm'n, see also 5 BACA v. ALL QUALITY/COPPERPOINT Decision of the Court Douglas, 202 Ariz. at 348, ¶¶ 11, 13 (affirming award based on Commission's conclusory finding that claimant testified credibly).
- Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 770 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1989
-
Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
770 P.2d 308
Ariz. 1989
-89 , -59 (Ct.App.1985); , (review denied) (court set aside award because judge failed to explain disposal of testimony in deciding to deny benefits).
- Jessie's Boat Shop & R v. Repair v. Industrial Commission 746 P.2d 1310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Jessie's Boat Shop & R v. Repair v. Industrial Commission 746 P.2d 1310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Villanueva v. Industrial Commission 714 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Villanueva v. Industrial Commission 714 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Ford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 703 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1985
- Ford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 703 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1985
- Payne v. Industrial Commission 664 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- Payne v. Industrial Commission 664 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 631 P.2d 1087 Ariz. 1981
-
Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.
631 P.2d 1087
Ariz. 1981
Van Duzee v. Industrial Commission, 25 Ariz.App.
- Cavco Industries v. Industrial Commission 631 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
Cavco Industries v. Industrial Commission
631 P.2d 1094
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
They point to the fact that Dr. Morgan, and also the hearing officer in adopting the opinion of Dr. Morgan as to a five percent impairment rating of claimant’s thumb, made no reference to any rating guide, and that the findings of the hearing officer thereby failed to address a
- Asarco, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 594 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Asarco, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 594 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Industrial Commission 588 P.2d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Industrial Commission 588 P.2d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Hawthorne v. Industrial Commission 559 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1976
-
Hawthorne v. Industrial Commission
559 P.2d 183
Ariz. 1976
In arguing that the evidence does not support the hearing officer’s decision, Hawthorne relies primarily on this court’s
- Janis v. Industrial Commission 553 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Janis v. Industrial Commission
553 P.2d 1248
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
While it is the condition of a claimant at the time of the hearing which determines whether his condition is stationary, , ; , the chronology of the medical examinations is not wholly determinative of which physician’s testimony must be accepted.
- Radlein v. Industrial Commission 553 P.2d 248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Radlein v. Industrial Commission
553 P.2d 248
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Arizona Supreme Court) : “While it is the condition of a claimant at the time of the hearing which determines whether his condition is stationary, , , the chronology of the medical examinations is not wholly determinative of which physician’s testimony must be accepted.