Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Stephens v. Industrial Commission, 559 P.2d 212.

106 citing documents.

Santiago v. Industrial Commission 972 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Santiago v. Industrial Commission 972 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
See, e.g., Stephens v. Industrial Comm’n
Teller v. Industrial Commission 879 P.2d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Teller v. Industrial Commission 879 P.2d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
E.g., Stephens v. Industrial Comm’n
Mail Boxes, U.S.A. v. Industrial Commission 871 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Mail Boxes, U.S.A. v. Industrial Commission 871 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
See Stephens v. Industrial Comm’n
Word v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 857 P.2d 1328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Word v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 857 P.2d 1328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Spielman v. Industrial Commission 788 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Spielman v. Industrial Commission 788 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
See, e.g., Stephens v. Industrial Comm’n
Obersteiner v. Industrial Commission 779 P.2d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Obersteiner v. Industrial Commission 779 P.2d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Norsworthy v. Industrial Commission, 24 Ariz.App.
Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 747 P.2d 1200 Ariz. 1987
Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 747 P.2d 1200 Ariz. 1987
Rouse v. Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 752 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Rouse v. Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 752 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Comm’n, , Calixto v. Industrial Comm’n, , Stephens v. Industrial Comm’n
Wilson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 709 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Wilson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 709 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 699 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 699 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
American Insurance v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
American Ins. Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
American Ins. Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
American Insurance v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Commission 686 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Commission 686 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arizona Downs v. Turf Paradise, Inc. 682 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arizona Downs v. Turf Paradise, Inc. 682 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
T5] The ripeness doctrine has been utilized in many instances to justify non-intervention by the courts when the complained of administrative action has not become final because of failure to exhaust appropriate administrative remedies, see
Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 680 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 680 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Estate of Sims v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 673 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Estate of Sims v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 673 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Although the employer-carrier denies this argument is properly presented, , (the issue must be raised before the Industrial Commission to be raised on appeal), we reach the merits of the argument.
Israel v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 669 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Israel v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 669 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Walters v. Industrial Commission 658 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Walters v. Industrial Commission 658 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
The respondents answer by citing the well established principle that it is the Commission’s prerogative to resolve conflicting medical opinions and this Court will not substitute its judgment for the Commission’s. See
A.J. Bayless Markets, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 655 P.2d 363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Criticized A.J. Bayless Markets, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 655 P.2d 363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Circle K Corp. v. Industrial Commission 653 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Circle K Corp. v. Industrial Commission 653 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Although it is the administrative law judge’s prerogative to resolve conflicting medical opinions, , his resolution must be based upon factual support in the record and be consistent with the findings as a whole.
Western Bonded Products v. Industrial Commission 647 P.2d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Western Bonded Products v. Industrial Commission 647 P.2d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Parkway Manufacturing v. Industrial Commission 626 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Parkway Manufacturing v. Industrial Commission 626 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Calixto v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 616 P.2d 75 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Calixto v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 616 P.2d 75 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Industrial Commission 606 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Industrial Commission 606 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Thus, , , that this court lacks authority to consider these issues based upon the principle of failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
Godfrey v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 602 P.2d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Godfrey v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 602 P.2d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979