Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Womack v. Industrial Commission, 412 P.2d 71.

32 citing documents.

Lockridge v. Am king/special Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lockridge v. Am king/special Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Russell v. Industrial Commission 533 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Russell v. Industrial Commission 533 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Mohrman 503 P.2d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State Compensation Fund v. Mohrman 503 P.2d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
598 , , ; Reed v. Industrial Commission, 3 Ariz.App.
Insurance Co. of North America v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Insurance Co. of North America v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
In a later case the Court noted that the burden of proof was on the claimant to establish his inability to work, , ; , we held that the uncontradicted testimony of the claimant that he suffered a 100% loss of earning capacity, which was corroborated by other evidence, was sufficient to establish the necessary burden of proof.
Fish v. Industrial Commission 472 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Fish v. Industrial Commission 472 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State Comp. Fund v. GARCIA AND INDUSTRIAL COM'N 467 P.2d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State Comp. Fund v. GARCIA AND INDUSTRIAL COM'N 467 P.2d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Clark v. Industrial Commission 460 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Clark v. Industrial Commission 460 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Foster v. Industrial Commission 441 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Foster v. Industrial Commission 441 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Citing Arizona Supreme Court cases, , : “ * * * Where evidence of an interested witness is corroborated by a disinterested witness in compensation proceedings a rejection of that evidence amounts to arbitrary action by the Industrial Commission.
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
the claimant, over objection by counsel, was ordered to enter into the record of the hearing the amount of Social Security disability benefits he and his family were drawing.
INT'L METAL PRODUCTS v. Industrial Com'n 436 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
International Metal Products Division of McGraw Edison Co. v. Industrial Commission 436 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
INT'L METAL PRODUCTS v. Industrial Com'n 436 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
International Metal Products Division of McGraw Edison Co. v. Industrial Commission 436 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
598 , , Reed v. Industrial Commission, 3 Ariz.App.
Valdon v. Industrial Commission 434 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Valdon v. Industrial Commission 434 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Andreason v. Industrial Commission 433 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Andreason v. Industrial Commission 433 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
that leading questions asked of the witness on cross-examination are not evidence which can conflict with the positive evidence submitted by the petitioner.
McKay v. Industrial Commission 433 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
McKay v. Industrial Commission 433 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
598 , , Reed v. Industrial Commission, 3 Ariz.App.
Maness v. Industrial Commission 425 P.2d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Maness v. Industrial Commission 425 P.2d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Salmi v. Industrial Commission 415 P.2d 126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Salmi v. Industrial Commission 415 P.2d 126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966