Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Evertsen v. Industrial Commission, 573 P.2d 69.

61 citing documents.

Ford v. Industrial Commission 703 P.2d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Ariz. 535, , in support of his position that the AU deprived claimant of a fair hearing in asking whether the report had been disclosed.
Kosik v. Industrial Commission 611 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Kosik v. Industrial Commission 611 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
discusses the impartial character which the Industrial Commission and its hearing officers must maintain in order to comport with the requirements of due process to the end that all parties appearing before the Commission will receive a fair and impartial hearing.
Camelback Contractors, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 608 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Camelback Contractors, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 608 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
approved and adopted, , this court held that the Industrial Commission had no standing to file briefs before this court for unrepresented claimants.
Schneidewind v. Industrial Commission 586 P.2d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Schneidewind v. Industrial Commission 586 P.2d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 640 v. Kayetan 581 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 640 v. Kayetan 581 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
opinion of the Court of Appeals approved and adopted as an opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court
Evertsen v. Industrial Commission 572 P.2d 804 Ariz. 1977
Evertsen v. Industrial Commission 572 P.2d 804 Ariz. 1977
The opinion of the Court of Appeals as reported in is approved and adopted as the opinion of this court.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by