Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phoenix Cotton Pickery v. Industrial Commission, 584 P.2d 601.

32 citing documents.

Ayon v. hyatt/broadspire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ayon v. hyatt/broadspire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Drake v. Az Cardinals Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Drake v. Az Cardinals Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Special Events Service, Inc. and Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Roberto Dominguez 266 P.3d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Special Events Service, Inc. and Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Roberto Dominguez 266 P.3d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Comm’n, 120 Ariz. 137, 138-39, -03 (App. 1978) (unprotested notice of claim status final as to merits of carrier‟s determination).
Special Fund Division/No Insurance Section v. Industrial Commission 250 P.3d 564 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Special Fund Division/No Insurance Section v. Industrial Commission 250 P.3d 564 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Lovitch v. Industrial Commission 41 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Lovitch v. Industrial Commission 41 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Cornelson v. Industrial Commission 17 P.3d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Cornelson v. Industrial Commission 17 P.3d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
nd decide two issues: (1) whether the clo *270 sure of the 1989 claim with a , and (2) whether, when petitioning to reopen after uncontested denials of prior petitions to reopen
Gerhardt v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 889 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Gerhardt v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 889 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Mehan v. Industrial Commission 808 P.2d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Mehan v. Industrial Commission 808 P.2d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
he precluded reopening: As revealed by this opinion, where there is a previous finality to an earlier disposition, followed by a later reopening petition, the applicant’s burden on the later petition is to show that he is afflicted with something new, additional or previously undiscovered fr
Tucson Steel Division v. Industrial Commission 744 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Tucson Steel Division v. Industrial Commission 744 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
See, e.g., Phoenix Cotton Pickery v. Industrial Comm’n
Vishinskas v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 711 P.2d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Vishinskas v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 711 P.2d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Gallegos v. Industrial Commission 695 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Gallegos v. Industrial Commission 695 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Laker v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 679 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Laker v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 679 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission 654 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission 654 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial Commission 651 P.2d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial Commission 651 P.2d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Bell v. Industrial Commission 617 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Bell v. Industrial Commission 617 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Arizona Sand & Rock v. IND. COM'N OF ARIZONA 600 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Arizona Sand & Rock v. IND. COM'N OF ARIZONA 600 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
These principles have been well developed in prior Arizona decisions, including this Court’s

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by