Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Allen v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 602 P.2d 841.

30 citing documents.

Smith v. Washington Elem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Smith v. Washington Elem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
France v. gila/arizona Counties Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
France v. gila/arizona Counties Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
May v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
May v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rural Metro Corp. v. Industrial Commission 3 P.3d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Rural Metro Corp. v. Industrial Commission 3 P.3d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Klosterman v. Industrial Comm’n, , Allen v. Industrial Comm’n, , see, e.g., Appleby v. Belden Corp., 22 Ark.App.
Martinez v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 962 P.2d 903 Ariz. 1998
Martinez v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 962 P.2d 903 Ariz. 1998
See, e.g., Allen v. Industrial Comm’n
Simpson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 942 P.2d 1172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Simpson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 942 P.2d 1172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Allen v. Industrial Comm’n
Mercante v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 735 P.2d 1384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Mercante v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 735 P.2d 1384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
O’ , , American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Industrial Commission, 25 Ariz.App.
Toto v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 698 P.2d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Toto v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 698 P.2d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Skyview Cooling Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 691 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Skyview Cooling Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 691 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Kentucky Fried Chicken v. Industrial Commission 688 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Kentucky Fried Chicken v. Industrial Commission 688 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 686 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 686 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Relying on the general rule that an industrial accident need only partially cause an injury, , claimant interprets the constitutional phrase, “is caused in whole, or in part, or is contributed to,” to prohibit the statutory requirement of substantial contribution.
Makinson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 655 P.2d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Makinson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 655 P.2d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Commission 652 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Commission 652 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
As authority for that proposition, petitioners rely on O’ , , and 1 A. Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 13.21.
Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 627 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1981
Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 627 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1981
O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 609 P.2d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 609 P.2d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
this court held that any subsequent injury acting on a primary injury is not compensable when the subsequent injury is the result of the claimant's intentional conduct rather than a medical condition over which he has no control.