Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Pascucci v. Industrial Commission, 616 P.2d 902.

36 citing documents.

Drake v. Az Cardinals Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Drake v. Az Cardinals Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Wells v. aps/pinnacle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Wells v. aps/pinnacle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, (citation omitted).
highway/arch v. Quiroz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
highway/arch v. Quiroz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Bowen v. hyatt/gallagher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Bowen v. hyatt/gallagher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lovitch v. Industrial Commission 41 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Lovitch v. Industrial Commission 41 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Comm’n, , “fits her case like a glove” because her condition has now been verified just as Pascucci’s condition of a herniated disc was verified after surgery as a previously undiscovered condition.
Bayless v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 880 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Bayless v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 880 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
sc “true cause” of unchanged symptoms); accord Chappell v. Industrial Comm’n, , (dictum) (suggesting that even though claimant litigated whether recommended surgery reasonably necessary and lost, she could petition to reopen, have the surgery, and if the treatment proved to be effective, recover compensation benefits); Pascucci v. Industrial Comm’n, , (Jacobson, J. dissenting) (affirming reopening when termination based on resolution of conflicting interpretations of myelogram and claimant subse
Ball Mfg. v. Industrial Commission 827 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Ball Mfg. v. Industrial Commission 827 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Secondly, the long standing [sic] rule in Arizona is that the Worker’s [sic] Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in favor of the worker, Pashcucd [sic] v. Industrial Commission, , [442]
Farish v. Industrial Commission 806 P.2d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Farish v. Industrial Commission 806 P.2d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Kollasch v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 783 P.2d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Kollasch v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 783 P.2d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
See, e.g., Crocker v. Industrial Comm’n, , accord, e.g., Pascucci v. Industrial Comm’n
Perry v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 741 P.2d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Perry v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 741 P.2d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
(Jacobson, J. dissenting).
Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 712 P.2d 429 Ariz. 1985
Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 712 P.2d 429 Ariz. 1985
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1089 Ariz. 1985
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1089 Ariz. 1985
Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Commission 695 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1985
Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Commission 695 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1985
Bill Breck Dodge, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 675 P.2d 275 Ariz. 1983
Bill Breck Dodge, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 675 P.2d 275 Ariz. 1983
Payne v. Industrial Commission 664 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Payne v. Industrial Commission 664 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission 654 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission 654 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 627 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1981
Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 627 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1981
Smitty’s Super Valu v. Industrial Com’n, supra; , , Pascucci v. Industrial Com’n.
Bell v. Industrial Commission 617 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Bell v. Industrial Commission 617 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
We recently dealt with a , Review Granted (S.Ct.