Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Archer v. Industrial Commission, 619 P.2d 27.

26 citing documents.

John R France v. ica/gila county/acip Ariz. 2021
John R France v. ica/gila county/acip Ariz. 2021
Comm’n of Ariz., see Verdugo v. Indus.
France v. gila/arizona Counties Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
France v. gila/arizona Counties Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Comm’n, 4 or perceived conflicts with his supervisor, Barnes v. Indus.
Howe v. phoenix/york Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Howe v. phoenix/york Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tucson Unified School District v. Industrial Commission 7 P.3d 142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Tucson Unified School District v. Industrial Commission 7 P.3d 142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
1 § 23-1043.01(B); see Findley v. Industrial Comm’n, , see also Archer v. Industrial Comm’n, , (“[E]motional stress may have multiple causes, some work-related, others not so related.”), overruled on other grounds, *135 Bush v. Industrial Comm’n
Aguiar v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 797 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Aguiar v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 797 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Comm’n, -05 , -33 (App.1980).
Barnes v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Barnes v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
The law sometimes requires that bright lines be drawn, and this court has done so, in Archer v. Industrial Comm’n.
Lapare v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 742 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Lapare v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 742 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
See also Archer v. Industrial Comm’n, , Pima Community College v. Industrial Comm’n
DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 686 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 686 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Ringling Bros. & Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Superior Court 680 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Ringling Bros. & Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Superior Court 680 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
95 , , (compensation denied on the basis of insufficient causal relationship between the injury and the accident).
Bush v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 667 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1983
Bush v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 667 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1983
and his finding that: [F]rom a legal standpoint the evidence fails to establish that the every day stress experienced by the applicant was any greater than that experienced by her coworkers.
Pima Community College v. Industrial Commission 669 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Pima Community College v. Industrial Commission 669 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
In other words, the stress must be “unexpected, unusual or extraordinary.” 2
Bush v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 667 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Bush v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 667 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
In reaching the legal conclusion of noncompensability, the Administrative Law Judge relied on this court’s
Findley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 660 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Findley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 660 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
at 203 , at 31 (App.1980), in which we stated: Emotional stress cases in the workmen’s compensation field — whether the emotional stress results in a heart attack or a disabling mental disorder — are extremely difficult.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by