Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Franco v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 633 P.2d 446.

31 citing documents.

Douglas v. montecito/safety Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Douglas v. montecito/safety Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Comm’n, (recognizing the purpose of workers’ compensation “is to reimburse injured workers for loss of earning capacity, not loss of earnings”).
Ellisor v. Az Ice peoria/cincinnati Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ellisor v. Az Ice peoria/cincinnati Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
The employee has the initial burden of proving LEC, and may satisfy it by presenting expert testimony to “establish[] evidence of job opportunities” that the employee could perform post-injury
karsten/sentry v. Sigala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
karsten/sentry v. Sigala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, ) (citations omitted).
Savin v. ica/assisted care/phx. Ins. Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Savin v. ica/assisted care/phx. Ins. Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Rent a Center v. Industrial Commission 956 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Rent a Center v. Industrial Commission 956 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Industrial Commission 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
ARIZONA DPS v. Industrial Com'n 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
ARIZONA DPS v. Industrial Com'n 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Industrial Commission 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
Arizona Dept. of Public Safety v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Doles v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 810 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Doles v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 810 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
149 Ariz. at 266 , 717 P.2d at 945 (quoting Franco v. Industrial Comm’n, , ) (citations omitted).
Roberts v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 781 P.2d 586 Ariz. 1989
Roberts v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 781 P.2d 586 Ariz. 1989
Franco v. Industrial Comm’n
Arden-Mayfair v. Industrial Commission 764 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Arden-Mayfair v. Industrial Commission 764 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
than reasonable thing to do under the circumstances, and the most appropriate and proper thing to do, then I strongly believe that current employment while he is going to school, that represents his current best earning capacity.” “[T]he purpose of worker’s compensation is to reimburse injured workers for loss of earning capacity, not loss of earnings.”
D'AMICO v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 717 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
D'AMICO v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 717 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Pima County Board of Supervisors v. Industrial Commission 716 P.2d 407 Ariz. 1986
Pima County Board of Supervisors v. Industrial Commission 716 P.2d 407 Ariz. 1986
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial Commission 700 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial Commission 700 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
(voluntary retirement does not furnish a basis for reduction of benefits on petition for rearrangement under A.R.S.
Felker v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 653 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Felker v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 653 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
If the claimant fails to prove he has made a good faith and reasonable effort to find other work, the burden does not shift to the employer, in the absence of other appropriate evidence
United Riggers Erectors v. Industrial Commission 640 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
United Riggers Erectors v. Industrial Commission 640 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by