Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz., 686 P.2d 1288.
- Sherman v. conns/travelers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Sherman v. conns/travelers
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Comm’n, (“[M]edical causation ordinarily requires expert medical testimony to establish that the industrial accident caused the injury.”).
- Timothy Matthews v. ica/city of tucson/tristar Ariz. 2022
- Timothy Matthews v. ica/city of tucson/tristar Ariz. 2022
- France v. gila/arizona Counties Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
France v. gila/arizona Counties
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Comm’n, (citing Allen v. Indus.
- Dean v. Cpe hr/zurich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Dean v. Cpe hr/zurich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Martinez v. Shc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Martinez v. Shc
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, (citations omitted).
- Buckman v. roadsafe/zurich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Buckman v. roadsafe/zurich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- May v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- May v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- crescent/twin City v. Ketterling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- crescent/twin City v. Ketterling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Keovorabouth v. Industrial Commission 214 P.3d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Keovorabouth v. Industrial Commission 214 P.3d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Mont Polanco v. Ica Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-
Mont Polanco v. Ica Pima County
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Comm’n, (“Legal causation concerns whether the injury arose out of and in the course of the employment.
- Grammatico v. Industrial Commission 117 P.3d 786 Ariz. 2005
- Komalestewa v. ica/stoneville pedigree/wausau Ins Ariz. 2005
-
Komalestewa v. ica/stoneville pedigree/wausau Ins
Ariz. 2005
Comm’n, (citing 1B Arthur Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 38.83 (1982)) (additional citations omitted).4 Article 18, Section 8 addresses legal causation.
-
Grammatico v. Industrial Commission
117 P.3d 786
Ariz. 2005
Comm’n, , (citing IB Arthur Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 38.83 (1982)) (additional citations omitted).
- Grammatico v. Industrial Commission 90 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-
Grammatico v. Industrial Commission
90 P.3d 211
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Comm’n of Ariz., , (citing 1B A. Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 38.83 (1982)) 4 A claimant shows “legal *13 causation” by demonstrating that the accident arose out of and in the course of employment.
- Conner Manufacturing, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 836 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
Conner Manufacturing, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
836 P.2d 464
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See generally Toto v. Industrial Comm’n, -14 , -59 (App.1985); DeSchaaf *254 v. Industrial Comm’n, -21 , -91 (App.1984).
- City of South Tucson v. Industrial Commission 753 P.2d 1199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
-
City of South Tucson v. Industrial Commission
753 P.2d 1199
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
See Atkinson, Kier Bros., Spicer Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, , 274 P. 634 (1929); DeSchaaf v. Industrial Comm’n
- Alvarado v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 716 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1986
- Alvarado v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 716 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1986
- Toto v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 698 P.2d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
-
Toto v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
698 P.2d 753
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
§ 23-1043.01(B) constitutional.” See also, , holding that equal protection is not violated by provisions of A.R.S.