Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Anton v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 688 P.2d 192.

66 citing documents.

Karber/Interstate Air v. Industrial Commission 885 P.2d 99 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Karber/Interstate Air v. Industrial Commission 885 P.2d 99 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Anton v. Industrial Comm’n
Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 836 P.2d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 836 P.2d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
the Special Fund and Reeder then contend that a de novo standard of review applies to the ALJ’s conclusion that London was Reeder’s employer, while Brad’s argues that the entire determination is a factual one
Swichtenberg v. Brimer 828 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Swichtenberg v. Brimer 828 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See Anton v. Industrial Comm’n
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 794 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1990
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 794 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1990
2 Contract language does not determine the relationship of the parties, rather the “objective nature of the relationship, [is] determined upon an analysis of the totality of the facts and circumstances of each case.” , Home Ins.
Jaimes v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 787 P.2d 1103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Jaimes v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 787 P.2d 1103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
See also and compare Anton v. Industrial Comm’n, , (independent judgment standard of review applied to conclusion that worker was independent contractor) with Hunt Building Corp. v. Industrial Comm’n, , (deferential standard of review applied to conclusion that worker was employee).
Central Management Co. v. Industrial Commission 781 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Central Management Co. v. Industrial Commission 781 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Anton v. Industrial Comm’n
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 781 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 781 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
City of Phoenix v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 742 P.2d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
City of Phoenix v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 742 P.2d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
P.2d 192 (App.1984) (determination of whether claimant is an independent contractor is a conclusion of law, and an appellate court must make an independent determination).