Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Smiles v. Industrial Commission, 406 P.2d 885.

28 citing documents.

Parr v. united/valeey Forge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Parr v. united/valeey Forge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
pierpont/federated v. Terando Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
pierpont/federated v. Terando Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Peterson v. navajo/travelers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Peterson v. navajo/travelers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Comm’n, (“This Court will not substitute its opinion for that of the [ALJ] where the [ALJ] has resolved a conflict in medical testimony.”).
transdev/old v. Nivens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
transdev/old v. Nivens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Olsen v. amazon/american Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Olsen v. amazon/american Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Garcia v. vw/copperpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Garcia v. vw/copperpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ifezue v. ironwood/copperpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ifezue v. ironwood/copperpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jackson v. Ssp america/north River Ins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jackson v. Ssp america/north River Ins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
C2 enterprises/berkshire v. Monge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
C2 enterprises/berkshire v. Monge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Martin v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Martin v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Zaragoza v. Industrial Commission 445 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Zaragoza v. Industrial Commission 445 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Wones v. Industrial Commission 437 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Wones v. Industrial Commission 437 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Frizzell v. Industrial Commission 432 P.2d 152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Frizzell v. Industrial Commission 432 P.2d 152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Baxter v. Industrial Commission 430 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Baxter v. Industrial Commission 430 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
“A That is correct.” We have stated: “The Court of Appeals will not substitute its opinion for that of the Industrial Commission where the Commission has resolved a conflict in medical testimony.”