Darst v. Industrial Commission
Cited by
- State v. Christensen 628 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Newman 595 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Canaday 574 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- Ray Korte Chevrolet v. Simmons 571 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Raffaele 550 P.2d 1060 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Lee 542 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- State v. Matus 486 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Bedwell v. Industrial Commission 104 Ariz. 443
Opinion text
CASE, Judge. Petitioner herein complains of an award entered by the Commission holding that petitioner did not sustain an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. * A reading of the transcript indicates that there is a conflict in the evidence as to whether petitioner had an' accident and sustained any injury. Petitioner has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence both his injury and the fact of the accident. In re Estate of Bedwell (Bedwell v. Industrial Commission of Arizona), 104 Ariz. 443 , 454 P.2d 985 (1969). The state of the evidence entitled the Commission to find that he did not meet that burden. The award is affirmed. STEVENS, P. J, and DONOFRIO, J., concur. This case was decided under the law as it existed prior to 1 January 1969.