State Compensation Fund v. Thompson
Cited by
- Dcs, S.P. v. Juan P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Babe Investment v. Arizona Corp. Commission 939 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Pfeil v. Smith 900 P.2d 12 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Troutman v. Valley Nat. Bank of Arizona 826 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Woerth v. City of Flagstaff 808 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- Peck v. Board of Education of Yuma Union High School District 612 P.2d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Board of Education of Tempe Union High School v. Lammle 596 P.2d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Indian Oasis School District No. 40 & Board of Trustees v. Zambrano 526 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Tsakiris v. Phoenix Union High School System 502 P.2d 1093 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Pima College v. Sinclair 496 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Opinion text
STEVENS, Judge. This case is before the Court by writ of certiorari brought by the petitioner State Compensation Fund to review the lawful^ ness of an award and findings of' The Industrial Commission issued 30 January 1970 denying a petition for hearing directed to the award issued 31 October 1969 granting the respondent employee unscheduled permanent partial disability. * The Fund is appealing an evidentiary ruling made by the hearing officer, which was adopted by the Commission. We have examined the record and find no error. In addition, the Fund alleges that the award of the Commission is not reasonably supported by the evidence. We have examined the record and find that the award is supported by the record. Award affirmed. DONOFRIO, P. J., and CAMERON, J., concur. This case was decided under the law as it existed prior to 1 January 1969.