Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Aragon v. Industrial Commission, 481 P.2d 545.

32 citing documents.

Torgyik v. bell/trans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Torgyik v. bell/trans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Gutierrez v. phoenix/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Gutierrez v. phoenix/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Amenya v. mentor/aiu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Amenya v. mentor/aiu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Morley v. Salvation army/salvation Army Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Morley v. Salvation army/salvation Army Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
C2 enterprises/berkshire v. Monge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
C2 enterprises/berkshire v. Monge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Al-Sharifi v. Mayo Clinic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Al-Sharifi v. Mayo Clinic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tsosie v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 905 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Tsosie v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 905 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Jessie's Boat Shop & R v. Repair v. Industrial Commission 746 P.2d 1310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Jessie's Boat Shop & R v. Repair v. Industrial Commission 746 P.2d 1310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
A claimant’s condition is stationary when it has reached a “relatively stable status so that nothing further in the way of medical treatment is indicated to improve that condition.”
Desert Insulations, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 654 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Desert Insulations, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 654 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Savage Welding Supplies v. Industrial Commission 587 P.2d 778 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Savage Welding Supplies v. Industrial Commission 587 P.2d 778 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
While the courts have had some difficulty in formulating the definition of a stationary condition, , a working rule was established: “[t]he term ‘stationary’ refers to that time when the physical condition of the employee resulting from the industrial injury has reached a relatively stable status so that nothing further in the way of medical treatment is indicated to improve that condition.” 14
Janis v. Industrial Commission 553 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Janis v. Industrial Commission 553 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Recognizing that there are no absolute standards which can be used, the decisions have nevertheless developed the general guidelines which we have set forth in Aragon [ , ] as being whether the workman’s physical condition has reached a ‘relatively stable status’ so that nothing further in the way of medical treatment is indicated to improve that condition.
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 532 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 532 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
In Aragon v. Industrial Commission of Arizo *296 na, , we said: “the term ‘stationary’ refers to that time when the physical condition of the emT ployee resulting from the industrial injury has reached a relatively stable status so that nothing further in the way of medical treatment is indicated to improve that condition.” 14 Ariz.App.
Home Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 530 P.2d 1123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Home Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 530 P.2d 1123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 528 P.2d 817 Ariz. 1974
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 528 P.2d 817 Ariz. 1974
Once the claimant’s condition becomes stationary, that is “when the physical condition of the employee resulting from the industrial injury has reached a relatively stable status so that nothing further in the way of medical treatment is indicated to improve [claimant’s] condition,” , then the claimant is no longer entitled to receive payment of temporary partial benefits.
Morgan v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Morgan v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. Industrial Commission 500 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. Industrial Commission 500 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
we discussed the significance of the medical opinion that an injury was or was not “stationary” in these terms: “ .