Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Commission, 494 P.2d 398.

32 citing documents.

Storey v. mesa/york Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Storey v. mesa/york Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wozniak v. Industrial Commission 359 P.3d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Wozniak v. Industrial Commission 359 P.3d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Comm’n (Floyd I), (“[I]f the evidence shows that for some reason said wages do not realistically reflect the claimant’s demonstrated earning capacity, then the [ALJ] should consider wages received over such a reasonable period in excess of thirty days as would allow the consideration of pertinent factors.”).
Julie Munoz v. Sonic Restaurants 10 and Hartford Accident & indemnity/gallagher Bassett 318 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Julie Munoz v. Sonic Restaurants 10 and Hartford Accident & indemnity/gallagher Bassett 318 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Comm’n, but has chosen not to overrule its holding.
Morse v. Industrial Commission 146 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Morse v. Industrial Commission 146 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Carr v. Industrial Commission 3 P.3d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Carr v. Industrial Commission 3 P.3d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
See Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Comm’n
Swift Transportation v. Industrial Commission 938 P.2d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Swift Transportation v. Industrial Commission 938 P.2d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, -04 , -04 (1972); Elco Veterinary Supply v. Industrial Comm’n, -48 , -91 (App.1983).
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
See Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, 506-08 , 406-08 (1972).
Southwest Restaurant Systems v. Industrial Commission 825 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Southwest Restaurant Systems v. Industrial Commission 825 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See, e.g., Davis v. Industrial Comm’n of Arizona, , (citing Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial *435 Comm’n, , ).
Davis v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 655 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Davis v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 655 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Faith Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Industrial Commission 581 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Faith Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Industrial Commission 581 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
As stated by this Court in Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, , this goal is to determine a “realistic pre-injury wage base which can serve as a standard for comparison with the post-injury earning capacity of the injured workman.” Id.
United Metro v. Industrial Commission 570 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
United Metro v. Industrial Commission 570 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Harvey Auto Supply Inc. v. Industrial Commission 542 P.2d 1154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Harvey Auto Supply Inc. v. Industrial Commission 542 P.2d 1154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Moorehead v. Industrial Commission, 17 Ariz.App.
Hobbs v. Industrial Commission 533 P.2d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Hobbs v. Industrial Commission 533 P.2d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Respondents appear to rely solely upon the general rule that the Commission has wide discretion to determine a *423 realistic pre-injury wage base, , , A.R.S.
Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Petitioner has filed this writ of certiorari contending that the respondent Industrial Commission failed to follow the law of this case as decided by Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co.
Dominquez v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Dominquez v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Wheeler v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 528 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Wheeler v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 528 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
This line of reasoning has been questioned by Judge Haire in Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Com’n, , : “8.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by