Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Compensation Fund v. De La Fuente, 501 P.2d 422.

25 citing documents.

State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewit 399 P.3d 663 Ariz. 2017
Hamilton v. State 925 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hamilton v. State 925 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
These decisions indicate only that the Legislature may through appropriately definite language authorize administrative bodies to promulgate regulations that supplement legislation, -52 , -28 (App. 1972); , 351— 52, , 50-51 (1965), and that the scope of the administrative body’s authority to regulate may be expressly stated or implied from the statutory scheme.
Carondelet Health Services v. Industrial Commission 845 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Carondelet Health Services v. Industrial Commission 845 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Ethridge v. Arizona State Board of Nursing 796 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Ethridge v. Arizona State Board of Nursing 796 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Lake Havasu City v. Mohave County 675 P.2d 1371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Lake Havasu City v. Mohave County 675 P.2d 1371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 2 v. Phoenix Employee Relations Board 650 P.2d 429 Ariz. 1982
Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 2 v. Phoenix Employee Relations Board 650 P.2d 429 Ariz. 1982
Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 631 P.2d 1087 Ariz. 1981
Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 631 P.2d 1087 Ariz. 1981
review denied , , two other “void for vagueness” doctrines independent of due process.
Diesel Drivers v. Industrial Commission 593 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Diesel Drivers v. Industrial Commission 593 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
order granting petition for review vacated, , Laws 1974, Chap.
Cohen v. State 588 P.2d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Cohen v. State 588 P.2d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Lindsay v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 564 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Lindsay v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 564 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
this court outlined three bases upon which a statute may be declared void for vagueness: 1) the language lacks sufficient legal significance to be capable of intelligent execution; 2) it constitutes an undue delegation of legislative powers; or 3) its operation violates due process under Art. 2
Adams v. Industrial Commission 547 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Adams v. Industrial Commission 547 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
*291 246 , review denied
Moore v. Industrial Commission 538 P.2d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Moore v. Industrial Commission 538 P.2d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
On September 28, 1972, , holding that § 23-1046(A)(8) was an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority.
State Compensation Fund v. De La Fuente 511 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1973
State Compensation Fund v. De La Fuente 511 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1973
On petition for Review of , SOI P.2d 422.