Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Spears v. Industrial Commission, 513 P.2d 695.

35 citing documents.

Holt v. integrity/zurich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Holt v. integrity/zurich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Comm’n, (citation omitted).
Tepox-Ramirez v. afabe/travelers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tepox-Ramirez v. afabe/travelers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Frankel v. jpmorgan/new Hampshire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Frankel v. jpmorgan/new Hampshire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Comm’n, (citation omitted).
Sanders v. bowie/american Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sanders v. bowie/american Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tatman v. pavestone/liberty Fire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tatman v. pavestone/liberty Fire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Doss v. walmart/claims Mgt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Doss v. walmart/claims Mgt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Noble v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 683 P.2d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Noble v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 683 P.2d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Parkway Manufacturing v. Industrial Commission 626 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Parkway Manufacturing v. Industrial Commission 626 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
For cases holding that expert medical testimony was necessary to establish compensability of a claim, see, e. g., , Stevens v. Industrial Commission, 14 Ariz.App.
Priedigkeit v. Industrial Commission 542 P.2d 1140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Priedigkeit v. Industrial Commission 542 P.2d 1140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Damron v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 20 Ariz.App.
Lawler v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Lawler v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Reed v. Industrial Commission 534 P.2d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Reed v. Industrial Commission 534 P.2d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Montano v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 18 Ariz.App.
Koval v. Industrial Commission 532 P.2d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Koval v. Industrial Commission 532 P.2d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Reviewing the evidence in light most favorable toward sustaining the conclusions of the hearing officer and The Industrial Commission of Arizona, , , , we hold the findings and award are supported by substantial evidence.
Miller v. Industrial Commission 532 P.2d 163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Miller v. Industrial Commission 532 P.2d 163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Dye v. Industrial Commission 530 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Figueroa v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Figueroa v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Having reviewed the evidence in this case in a light most favorable to sustaining the findings of the Commission, , Rowe v. Industrial Commission, 20 Ariz.App.
Carranza v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Carranza v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Rowe v. Industrial Commission, 20 Ariz.App.
Reynolds Metal Co. v. Industrial Commission 527 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Reynolds Metal Co. v. Industrial Commission 527 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Rowe v. Industrial Commission, 20 Ariz.App.