Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Central Management Co. v. Industrial Commission, 781 P.2d 1374.

36 citing documents.

J-King v. Conley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
J-King v. Conley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Comm’n, –90 (App. 1989).
Ibrahim v. Mkts llc/special Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Ibrahim v. Mkts llc/special Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Guzman v. Voice & data/hartford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Guzman v. Voice & data/hartford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ja framing/copperpoint v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ja framing/copperpoint v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Comm’n, (citing Anton v. Indus.
Meno's construction/aig v. Reyes 442 P.3d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Meno's construction/aig v. Reyes 442 P.3d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Comm’n, and Anton v. Indus.
Danial v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz. 434 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Danial v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz. 434 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Comm'n , , 189, (quoting 1C A. Larson, Workmen's Compensation Law § 44.10 (1986) ); see also Home Ins.
Mattly v. brown/focus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mattly v. brown/focus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Julie Munoz v. Sonic Restaurants 10 and Hartford Accident & indemnity/gallagher Bassett 318 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Julie Munoz v. Sonic Restaurants 10 and Hartford Accident & indemnity/gallagher Bassett 318 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Comm’n, see also Handbook § 2.2.1.1, at 2-5, 2-7.
Jaramillo v. Industrial Commission 58 P.3d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Jaramillo v. Industrial Commission 58 P.3d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Comm’n, , (quoting Hunt Bldg.
State Compensation Fund v. Yellow Cab Co. 3 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State Compensation Fund v. Yellow Cab Co. 3 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
The trial court concluded that Central Management Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, , which affirmed an award of workers’ compensation benefits to a taxi driver, required a finding that Yellow Cab drivers were employees and not independent contractors.
Vance International v. Industrial Commission 952 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Vance International v. Industrial Commission 952 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
In Central Management Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, , we affirmed the ALJ’s determination that a taxicab driver who sublet her vehicle to claimant was not claimant’s employer despite the exercise of control over the care of the vehicle.
Faraghar v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 911 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Faraghar v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 911 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Central Management Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, , Anton v. Industrial Comm’n
Marron v. Industrial Commission 862 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Marron v. Industrial Commission 862 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Rico v. Industrial Commission 846 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Rico v. Industrial Commission 846 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Central Management Co. v. Industrial Comm’n
Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 836 P.2d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 836 P.2d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Swichtenberg v. Brimer 828 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Swichtenberg v. Brimer 828 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Accord Central Management Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, , , Anton v. Industrial Comm’n, , Molnar v. Industrial Comm’n
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 794 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1990
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 794 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1990
Hamilton v. Family Record Plan, Inc., 71 Ill.App.2d 39, 47 , 217 N.E.2d 113, 117 (1966); see also Greening v. Gazette Printing Co., 108 Mont.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by