Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hartford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona, 870 P.2d 1202.

34 citing documents.

Giglio v. Mirshahzadeh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Giglio v. Mirshahzadeh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Comm’n of Ariz., (“Adequate consideration consists of any performance which is bargained for”).
Fiflis v. Cave Creek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Fiflis v. Cave Creek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Comm’n. of Ariz., (“Mutual assent is based on objective evidence, not on the hidden intent of the parties.”).
Fiflis v. Cave Creek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Fiflis v. Cave Creek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Comm’n. of Ariz., (“Mutual assent is based on objective evidence, not on the hidden intent of the parties.”).
Garsha v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Garsha v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Buckholtz v. Buckholtz 435 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Atem v. Holsum bakery/ace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Buckholtz v. Buckholtz 435 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Comm'n , , 112, , 1208 (App. 1994).
Atem v. Holsum bakery/ace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Comm’n, (citations omitted).
Gonzalez v. interstate/xl Specialty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gonzalez v. interstate/xl Specialty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, (citing Hill-Shafer P’).
Sessions v. Sessions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sessions v. Sessions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n of Ariz., (noting that a unilateral mistake is one where only one party to an agreement is mistaken as to the subject matter or the agreement’s expression).
Cantex v. Princeton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Cantex v. Princeton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, Ahwatukee Custom Estates Mgmt.
Baldino v. Greenburg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Baldino v. Greenburg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re Estate of Lamparella 109 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In Re Estate of Lamparella 109 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Comm’n of Ariz., , US West Communications, Inc. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm’n, , (citing Taylor v. State Farm Mut.
Burke v. Voicestream Wireless Corp. II 87 P.3d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Burke v. Voicestream Wireless Corp. II 87 P.3d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Tabler v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 47 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Tabler v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 47 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Pasco Industries, Inc. v. Talco Recycling, Inc. 985 P.2d 535 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Pasco Industries, Inc. v. Talco Recycling, Inc. 985 P.2d 535 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
The Hartford v. Industrial Comm’n
Max of Switzerland, Inc. v. Allright Corp. 930 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Max of Switzerland, Inc. v. Allright Corp. 930 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
“[A]pparent authority exists where a third person reasonably believes an agent has the authority of the principal.” Hartford v. Industrial Comm’n, , (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 8 cmt.